298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18234439)
1. Dosimetric consequences of intrafraction prostate motion.
Li HS; Chetty IJ; Enke CA; Foster RD; Willoughby TR; Kupellian PA; Solberg TD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(3):801-12. PubMed ID: 18234439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between dosimetric effect and intrafraction motion during prostate treatments delivered with helical tomotherapy.
Langen KM; Lu W; Ngwa W; Willoughby TR; Chauhan B; Meeks SL; Kupelian PA; Olivera G
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7073-86. PubMed ID: 19015580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of non-exclusion of the rectum from the boost PTV in IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients.
Kassim I; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 19278745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of planning margin on dosimetric quality in 131Cs permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Li T; Fountain BL; Duffy EW
Brachytherapy; 2010; 9(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 19853535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intrafraction prostate translations and rotations during hypofractionated robotic radiation surgery: dosimetric impact of correction strategies and margins.
van de Water S; Valli L; Aluwini S; Lanconelli N; Heijmen B; Hoogeman M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Apr; 88(5):1154-60. PubMed ID: 24661668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetric evaluations of intrafraction motion for gated and ungated intensity modulated arc therapy deliveries.
Oliver M; Gladwish A; Staruch R; Craig J; Gaede S; Chen J; Wong E
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6419-36. PubMed ID: 18941277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric effects of patient rotational setup errors on prostate IMRT treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Li X; Heron DE; Huq MS; Yue NJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5321-31. PubMed ID: 17019041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of changing technique, dose, and PTV margin on therapeutic ratio during prostate radiotherapy.
Huang SH; Catton C; Jezioranski J; Bayley A; Rose S; Rosewall T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(4):1057-64. PubMed ID: 18339487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric consequences of the application of off-line setup error correction protocols and a hull-volume definition strategy for intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Baum C; Birkner M; Alber M; Paulsen F; Nüsslin F
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jul; 76(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 16019092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postprostatectomy target-normal structure overlap volume differences using computed tomography and radioimmunoscintigraphy images for radiotherapy treatment planning.
Su A; Blend MJ; Spelbring D; Hamilton RJ; Jani AB
Clin Nucl Med; 2006 Mar; 31(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 16495731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A study of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy with fiducials for localized prostate cancer including pelvic lymph nodes.
Hsu A; Pawlicki T; Luxton G; Hara W; King CR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jul; 68(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 17459610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Margins for treatment planning of proton therapy.
Thomas SJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1491-501. PubMed ID: 16510958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of a novel dose-uncertainty model for dose-uncertainty analysis in prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Jin H; Palta JR; Kim YH; Kim S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Nov; 78(3):920-8. PubMed ID: 20584579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A phase II trial for the optimisation of treatment position in the radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
O'Neill L; Armstrong J; Buckney S; Assiri M; Cannon M; Holmberg O
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18453021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of intrafraction prostate motion on proton pencil beam scanning delivery: a quantitative assessment.
Tang S; Deville C; McDonough J; Tochner Z; Wang KK; Vapiwala N; Both S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 23958148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DMLC tracking and gating can improve dose coverage for prostate VMAT.
Colvill E; Poulsen PR; Booth JT; O'Brien RT; Ng JA; Keall PJ
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091705. PubMed ID: 25186380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins for finite fractions and small systematic errors.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(7):1967-90. PubMed ID: 17374922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Daily isocenter correction with electromagnetic-based localization improves target coverage and rectal sparing during prostate radiotherapy.
Rajendran RR; Plastaras JP; Mick R; McMichael Kohler D; Kassaee A; Vapiwala N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Mar; 76(4):1092-9. PubMed ID: 19625136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.
Gordon JJ; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 18383678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
