185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18235982)
1. Efficiency of MR imaging to orientate surgical treatment of posterior deep pelvic endometriosis.
Roy C; Balzan C; Thoma V; Sauer B; Wattiez A; Leroy J
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 18235982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of using endorectal coil in preoperative staging of rectal carcinomas by pelvic MR imaging.
Donmez FY; Tunaci M; Yekeler E; Balik E; Tunaci A; Acunas G
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jul; 67(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 17720346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Local staging of rectal cancer using combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coil MRI.
Tatli S; Mortele KJ; Breen EL; Bleday R; Silverman SG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 16523466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Ureteric and bladder involvement of deep pelvic endometriosis. Value of multidisciplinary surgical management].
Marcelli F; Collinet P; Vinatier D; Robert Y; Triboulet JP; Biserte J; Villers A
Prog Urol; 2006 Nov; 16(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 17175957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in severe pelvic endometriosis.
Dumontier I; Roseau G; Vincent B; Chapron C; Dousset B; Chaussade S; Moreau JF; Dubuisson JB; Couturier D
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2000 Dec; 24(12):1197-204. PubMed ID: 11173733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease.
Bazot M; Darai E; Hourani R; Thomassin I; Cortez A; Uzan S; Buy JN
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 15205479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cancer: value of an endovaginal coil magnetic resonance imaging technique in detecting small volume disease and assessing parametrial extension.
deSouza NM; Dina R; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Jul; 102(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16427688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endometriosis: contribution of 3.0-T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assessment--initial results.
Hottat N; Larrousse C; Anaf V; Noël JC; Matos C; Absil J; Metens T
Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 19584256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma.
Kim MJ; Chung JJ; Lee YH; Lee JT; Yoo HS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1215-21. PubMed ID: 9129414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Imaging features of endometriosis].
Balleyguier C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003 Dec; 32(8 Pt 2):S5-10. PubMed ID: 14968060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recurrent or residual pelvic bowel cancer: accuracy of MRI local extent before salvage surgery.
Robinson P; Carrington BM; Swindell R; Shanks JH; O'dwyer ST
Clin Radiol; 2002 Jun; 57(6):514-22. PubMed ID: 12069470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of thin section magnetic resonance using phased-array pelvic coil in predicting the T-staging of rectal cancer.
Poon FW; McDonald A; Anderson JH; Duthie F; Rodger C; McCurrach G; McKee RF; Horgan PG; Foulis AK; Chong D; Finlay IG
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Feb; 53(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 15664289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer.
Park BK; Kim B; Kim CK; Lee HM; Kwon GY
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):534-8. PubMed ID: 17882027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
Yoshizako T; Wada A; Hayashi T; Uchida K; Sumura M; Uchida N; Kitagaki H; Igawa M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Value of pelvic MRI in the preoperative diagnosis of endometriosis].
Hauth EA; Antoch G; Ruehm SG; Böing C; Kimmig R; Forsting M
Rofo; 2004 Sep; 176(9):1265-70. PubMed ID: 15346261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3-T MRI with phased-array coil in local staging of prostatic cancer.
Torricelli P; Barberini A; Cinquantini F; Sighinolfi M; Cesinaro AM
Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1118-25. PubMed ID: 18692752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging of the prostate at 3.0T with external phased array coil - preliminary results.
Morakkabati-Spitz N; Bastian PJ; Gieseke J; Träber F; Kuhl CK; Wattjes MP; Müller SC; Schild HH
Eur J Med Res; 2008 Jun; 13(6):287-91. PubMed ID: 18558555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning curve in the detection of ovarian and deep endometriosis by using Magnetic Resonance: comparison with surgical results.
Saba L; Guerriero S; Sulis R; Pilloni M; Ajossa S; Melis G; Mallarini G
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Aug; 79(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 20171820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging--a realistic option.
Booth SJ; Turnbull LW; Poole DR; Richmond I
BJOG; 2008 Jun; 115(7):894-901. PubMed ID: 18485169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond laparoscopy: 3-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of posterior cul-de-sac obliteration.
Manganaro L; Vittori G; Vinci V; Fierro F; Tomei A; Lodise P; Sollazzo P; Sergi ME; Bernardo S; Ballesio L; Marini M; Porpora MG
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 30(10):1432-8. PubMed ID: 22835943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
