BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18236143)

  • 1. Adults usually believe young children: the influence of eliciting questions and suggestibility presentations on perceptions of children's disclosures.
    Laimon RL; Poole DA
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Dec; 32(6):489-501. PubMed ID: 18236143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of question repetition within interviews on young children's eyewitness recall.
    Krähenbühl S; Blades M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 May; 94(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 16438980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expert testimony regarding child witnesses: does it sensitize jurors to forensic interview quality?
    Buck JA; London K; Wright DB
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):152-64. PubMed ID: 20443056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do jurors "know" what isn't so about child witnesses?
    Quas JA; Thompson WC; Alison K; Stewart C
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):425-56. PubMed ID: 16133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptions and predictors of children's credibility of a unique event and an instance of a repeated event.
    Connolly DA; Price HL; Lavoie JA; Gordon HM
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Feb; 32(1):92-112. PubMed ID: 17253152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamics of forensic interviews with suspected abuse victims who do not disclose abuse.
    Hershkowitz I; Orbach Y; Lamb ME; Sternberg KJ; Horowitz D
    Child Abuse Negl; 2006 Jul; 30(7):753-69. PubMed ID: 16846642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of eyewitness expert evidence and judicial instruction on juror ability to evaluate eyewitness testimony.
    Martire KA; Kemp RI
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 18597165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Video Suggestibility Scale for Children: how generalizable is children's performance to other measures of suggestibility?
    McFarlane F; Powell MB
    Behav Sci Law; 2002; 20(6):699-716. PubMed ID: 12465135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judging the accuracy of children's recall: a statement-level analysis.
    Ball CT; O'Callaghan J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Dec; 7(4):331-45. PubMed ID: 11838895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The consistency of false suggestions moderates children's reports of a single instance of a repeated event: predicting increases and decreases in suggestibility.
    Roberts KP; Powell MB
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 May; 94(1):68-89. PubMed ID: 16513130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A missing link in suggestibility research: what is known about the behavior of field interviewers in unstructured interviews with young children?
    Gilstrap LL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Mar; 10(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 15053699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unwarranted Assumptions about Children's Testimonial Accuracy.
    Ceci SJ; Kulkofsky S; Klemfuss JZ; Sweeney CD; Bruck M
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2007; 3():311-28. PubMed ID: 17716058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Police practices and perceptions regarding juvenile interrogation and interrogative suggestibility.
    Meyer JR; Reppucci ND
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):757-80. PubMed ID: 18046744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of interviewing techniques on young children's responses to questions.
    Krähenbühl S; Blades M
    Child Care Health Dev; 2006 May; 32(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 16634977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of promising to tell the truth, the putative confession, and recall and recognition questions on maltreated and non-maltreated children's disclosure of a minor transgression.
    Quas JA; Stolzenberg SN; Lyon TD
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():266-279. PubMed ID: 28950167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Telling interviewers about sexual abuse: predictors of child disclosure at forensic interviews.
    Lippert T; Cross TP; Jones L; Walsh W
    Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):100-13. PubMed ID: 18832489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effects of the Hypothetical Putative Confession and Negatively Valenced Yes/No Questions on Maltreated and Nonmaltreated Children's Disclosure of a Minor Transgression.
    Stolzenberg SN; McWilliams K; Lyon TD
    Child Maltreat; 2017 May; 22(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 27753611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Children as witnesses of violence: consequences for determining reliability].
    Trott GE; Friese HJ; Wirth S
    Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr; 1995 Mar; 23(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7771121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearsay versus children's testimony: Effects of truthful and deceptive statements on jurors' decisions.
    Goodman GS; Myers JE; Qin J; Quas JA; Castelli P; Redlich AD; Rogers L
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Jun; 30(3):363-401. PubMed ID: 16779675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Children's false memory and true disclosure in the face of repeated questions.
    Schaaf JM; Alexander KW; Goodman GS
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Jul; 100(3):157-85. PubMed ID: 18061609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.