These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18236334)

  • 21. Eyewitness identification: line-ups on trial.
    Spinney L
    Nature; 2008 May; 453(7194):442-4. PubMed ID: 18497791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The neuroethics of the social world of work.
    Senior C; Lee N; Butler M
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 18236341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The misquantification of probative value.
    Kaye DH; Koehler JJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Dec; 27(6):645-59. PubMed ID: 14724962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neuroethics, new ethics?
    Knoppers BM
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):33; discussion W3-4. PubMed ID: 16036697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Imagining a neuroethics which would go further than genethics.
    Doucet H
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):29-31; discussion W3-4. PubMed ID: 16036695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Emerging ethical issues in neuroscience.
    Farah MJ
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Nov; 5(11):1123-9. PubMed ID: 12404006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Brains, genes, and the making of the self.
    Reid L; Baylis F
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):21-3; discussion W3-4. PubMed ID: 16036691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Deceiving the law.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 11(11):1231. PubMed ID: 18956003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neuroscience and metaphysics.
    Buford C; Allhoff F
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):34-6; discussion W3-4. PubMed ID: 16036698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the proliferation of bioethics sub-disciplines: do we really need "genethics" and "neuroethics"?
    Wilfond BS; Ravitsky V
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):20-1; discussion W3-4. PubMed ID: 16036690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Neuroethics: a philosophical challenge.
    Evers K
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):31-3; discussion W3-4. PubMed ID: 16036696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Looking for truth and finding lies: the prospects for a nascent neuroimaging of deception.
    Spence SA; Kaylor-Hughes CJ
    Neurocase; 2008; 14(1):68-81. PubMed ID: 18569733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rape: medical and legal information.
    Price HR
    J Healthc Prot Manage; 1998; 14(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 10182065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Substance abuse, treatment, and the courts. Alcohol and drug abuse contributing factor in 80% of U.S. crimes.
    J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv; 1997 Jul; 35(7):8-9. PubMed ID: 9243416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neuroimaging: revolutionary research tool or a post-modern phrenology?
    Kennedy D
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(2):19; discussion W3-4. PubMed ID: 16036689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Polygraph testing for deception in Australia: effective aid to crime investigation and adjudication?
    McMahon M
    J Law Med; 2003 Aug; 11(1):24-47. PubMed ID: 14526725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Women's neuroethics? Why sex matters for neuroethics.
    Chalfin MC; Murphy ER; Karkazis KA
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 18236323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Will the law come running? The potential role of "brain fingerprinting" in crime investigation and adjudication in Australia.
    Dickson K; McMahon M
    J Law Med; 2005 Nov; 13(2):204-22. PubMed ID: 16304761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Standing on more than one leg: interdisciplinarity's balancing acts.
    Hurst SA
    Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 18236339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards.
    Schauer F
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 14(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 20060772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.