1287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18236391)
1. A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of neoral 2-hour postdose concentration monitoring versus tacrolimus trough concentration monitoring in de novo liver transplant recipients.
Shenoy S; Hardinger KL; Crippin J; Korenblat K; Lisker-Melman M; Lowell JA; Chapman W
Liver Transpl; 2008 Feb; 14(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 18236391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 12-month follow-up analysis of a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial in de novo liver transplant recipients (LIS2T) comparing cyclosporine microemulsion (C2 monitoring) and tacrolimus.
Levy G; Grazi GL; Sanjuan F; Wu Y; Mühlbacher F; Samuel D; Friman S; Jones R; Cantisani G; Villamil F; Cillo U; Clavien PA; Klintmalm G; Otto G; Pollard S; McCormick PA
Liver Transpl; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1464-72. PubMed ID: 17004259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of cyclosporine microemulsion and tacrolimus in 39 recipients of living donor liver transplantation.
Tanaka K; Lake J; Villamil F; Levy G; Marotta P; Mies S; de Hemptinne B; Moench C
Liver Transpl; 2005 Nov; 11(11):1395-402. PubMed ID: 16237691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical outcomes during the first three months posttransplant in renal allograft recipients managed by C2 monitoring of cyclosporine microemulsion.
Thervet E; Pfeffer P; Scolari MP; Toselli L; Pallardó LM; Chadban S; Pilmore H; Connolly J; Buchler M; Schena FP; Carreño CA; Dandavino R; Cole E
Transplantation; 2003 Sep; 76(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 14508352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolution of the absorption profile of cyclosporine A in renal transplant recipients: a longitudinal study of the de novo and maintenance phases.
Büchler M; Chadban S; Cole E; Midtvedt K; Thervet E; Prestele H; Keown P
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2006 Jan; 21(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 16204301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of generic cyclosporine microemulsion versus neoral in de novo renal transplant recipients managed by 2-hour postdose monitoring.
Sharma A; Shekhar C; Heer M; Minz M
Transplant Proc; 2006 Sep; 38(7):2051-3. PubMed ID: 16979996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A comparative randomized prospective multicenter study of Sandimmune vs Neoral in liver transplantation].
Roy A; Grant DR; Kneteman NM; Tchervenkov JI; Levy GA; Tan A; Hendricks L
Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):716-21. PubMed ID: 9846420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increased incidence of early de novo cancer in liver graft recipients treated with cyclosporine: an association with C2 monitoring and recipient age.
Tjon AS; Sint Nicolaas J; Kwekkeboom J; de Man RA; Kazemier G; Tilanus HW; Hansen BE; van der Laan LJ; Tha-In T; Metselaar HJ
Liver Transpl; 2010 Jul; 16(7):837-46. PubMed ID: 20583092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Early cyclosporine C0 and C2 monitoring in de novo kidney transplant patients: a prospective randomized single-center pilot study.
Kyllönen LE; Salmela KT
Transplantation; 2006 Apr; 81(7):1010-5. PubMed ID: 16612277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation: the Canadian tacrolimus versus microemulsion cyclosporin A trial: 1-year follow-up.
Greig P; Lilly L; Scudamore C; Erb S; Yoshida E; Kneteman N; Bain V; Ghent C; Marotta P; Grant D; Wall W; Tchervenkov J; Barkun J; Roy A; Marleau D; McAlister V; Peltekian K
Liver Transpl; 2003 Jun; 9(6):587-95. PubMed ID: 12783400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimizing tacrolimus therapy in the maintenance of renal allografts: 12-month results.
Bolin P; Shihab FS; Mulloy L; Henning AK; Gao J; Bartucci M; Holman J; First MR;
Transplantation; 2008 Jul; 86(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 18622283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rejection episodes after liver transplantation during primary immunosuppression with FK506 or a cyclosporine-based regimen: a controlled, prospective, randomized trial.
Jonas S; Kling N; Bechstein WO; Blumhardt G; Lohmann R; Lobeck H; Neuhaus P
Clin Transplant; 1995 Oct; 9(5):406-14. PubMed ID: 8541635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rationale and design of the DIRECT study: a comparative assessment of the hyperglycemic effects of tacrolimus and cyclosporine following renal transplantation.
Vincenti F; Rostaing L;
Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Feb; 26(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 15837449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. History of C2 monitoring in heart and liver transplant patients treated with cyclosporine microemulsion.
Cantarovich M; Barkun J; Giannetti N; Cecere R; Besner JG; Tchervenkov J
Transplant Proc; 2004 Mar; 36(2 Suppl):442S-447S. PubMed ID: 15041383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FK506 (tacrolimus) compared with cyclosporine for primary immunosuppression after pediatric liver transplantation. Results from the U.S. Multicenter Trial.
McDiarmid SV; Busuttil RW; Ascher NL; Burdick J; D'Alessandro AM; Esquivel C; Kalayoglu M; Klein AS; Marsh JW; Miller CM
Transplantation; 1995 Feb; 59(4):530-6. PubMed ID: 7533345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cyclosporine profiling with C2 and C0 monitoring improves outcomes after heart transplantation.
Barnard JB; Thekkudan J; Richardson S; Bittar MN; Martyszczuck R; Hasan J; Khasati N; Keevil B; Yonan N
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 May; 25(5):564-8. PubMed ID: 16678036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. C2 monitoring of cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients results in lower costs and improved renal function.
Domínguez J; Fuenzalida D; Norambuena R; Pais E; Cortes Monroy G; Llanos R
Transplant Proc; 2005 Apr; 37(3):1583-5. PubMed ID: 15866680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Limitations of cyclosporine C2 monitoring in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
Hmiel SP; Canter C; Shepherd R; Lassa-Claxton S; Nadler M
Pediatr Transplant; 2007 Aug; 11(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 17631021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cyclosporine C2 levels have impact on incidence of rejection in de novo lung but not heart transplant recipients: the NOCTURNE study.
Iversen M; Nilsson F; Sipponen J; Eiskjaer H; Mared L; Bergan S; Nyström U; Fagertun HE; Solbu D; Simonsen S
J Heart Lung Transplant; 2009 Sep; 28(9):919-26. PubMed ID: 19716045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Target range maximum of cyclosporine blood concentration two hours post dose in stable liver transplant patients.
Li J; Dahmen U; Beckebaum S; Cicinnati V; Valentin-Gamazo C; Frilling A; Malago M; Broelsch CE
Eur J Med Res; 2006 Apr; 11(4):139-45. PubMed ID: 16720277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
