These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Ultrasonic measurement of density of liquids flowing in tubes. Adamowski JC; Buiochi F; Sigelmann RA IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1998; 45(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 18244157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of the viscosity-density product using multiple reflections of ultrasonic shear horizontal waves. Greenwood MS; Adamson JD; Bond LJ Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e1031-6. PubMed ID: 16793108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Viscosity measurement of Newtonian liquids using the complex reflection coefficient. Franco EE; Adamowski JC; Higuti RT; Buiochi F IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2247-53. PubMed ID: 18986872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel approach to acoustic liquid density measurements using a buffer rod based measuring cell. Bjørndal E; Frøysa KE; Engeseth SA IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Aug; 55(8):1794-808. PubMed ID: 18986922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancing signal to noise ratio by fine-tuning tapers of cladded/uncladded buffer rods in ultrasonic time domain reflectometry in smelters. Viumdal H; Mylvaganam S Ultrasonics; 2014 Mar; 54(3):894-904. PubMed ID: 24268177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasonic inspection of batters for on-line process monitoring. Salazar J; Turó A; Chávez JA; García MJ Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):155-9. PubMed ID: 15047278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acoustic method for obtaining the pressure reflection coefficient using a half-wave layer. Liu JX; Wang ZQ; Li GF; Wang NH Ultrasonics; 2011 Apr; 51(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 21134687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Separated two-phase flow regime parameter measurement by a high speed ultrasonic pulse-echo system. Masala T; Harvel G; Chang JS Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 Nov; 78(11):114901. PubMed ID: 18052496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasonic density measurement cell design and simulation of non-ideal effects. Higuti RT; Buiochi F; Adamowski JC; de Espinosa FM Ultrasonics; 2006 Jul; 44(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 16690095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Density, ultrasound velocity, acoustic impedance, reflection and absorption coefficient determination of liquids via multiple reflection method. Hoche S; Hussein MA; Becker T Ultrasonics; 2015 Mar; 57():65-71. PubMed ID: 25465962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time domain evaluation of resonance antireflection (RAR) signals for ultrasonic density measurement. Hirnschrodt M; Von Jeana A; Vontz T; Fischer B; Lerch R; Meixner H IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2000; 47(6):1530-9. PubMed ID: 18238699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of surface acoustic wave velocity using a variable-line-focus polyurea thin-film ultrasonic transducer. Aoyagi T; Nakazawa M; Tabaru M; Nakamura K; Ueha S IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Aug; 56(8):1761-8. PubMed ID: 19686992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using ultrasonic attenuation to monitor slurry mixing in real time. Bamberger JA; Greenwood MS Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):145-8. PubMed ID: 15047276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acoustic methods for obtaining the pressure reflection coefficient from a buffer rod based measurement cell. Bjørndal E; Frøysa KE IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Aug; 55(8):1781-93. PubMed ID: 18986921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]