These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18238693)

  • 1. Acoustic streaming in micromachined flexural plate wave devices: numerical simulation and experimental verification.
    Nguyen NT; White RM
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2000; 47(6):1463-71. PubMed ID: 18238693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic streaming in the transducer plane in ultrasonic particle manipulation devices.
    Lei J; Glynne-Jones P; Hill M
    Lab Chip; 2013 Jun; 13(11):2133-43. PubMed ID: 23609455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation into the Effect of Acoustic Radiation Force and Acoustic Streaming on Particle Patterning in Acoustic Standing Wave Fields.
    Liu S; Yang Y; Ni Z; Guo X; Luo L; Tu J; Zhang D; Zhang AJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jul; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 28753955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic streaming in lithotripsy fields: preliminary observation using a particle image velocimetry method.
    Choi MJ; Doh DH; Hwang TG; Cho CH; Paeng DG; Rim GH; Coleman AJ
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Feb; 44(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 16376400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of acoustic streaming in a closed-loop traveling wave resonator using laser Doppler velocimetry.
    Desjouy C; Penelet G; Lotton P; Blondeau J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2176-83. PubMed ID: 19894797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical simulation of 3D boundary-driven acoustic streaming in microfluidic devices.
    Lei J; Hill M; Glynne-Jones P
    Lab Chip; 2014 Feb; 14(3):532-41. PubMed ID: 24284651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controlling acoustic streaming in an ultrasonic heptagonal tweezers with application to cell manipulation.
    Bernassau AL; Glynne-Jones P; Gesellchen F; Riehle M; Hill M; Cumming DR
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Jan; 54(1):268-74. PubMed ID: 23725599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numerical analysis of wave generation and propagation in a focused surface acoustic wave device for potential microfluidics applications.
    Sankaranarayanan SK; Bhethanabotla VR
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Mar; 56(3):631-43. PubMed ID: 19411221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of ultrasound power on acoustic streaming and micro-bubbles formations in a low frequency sono-reactor: mathematical and 3D computational simulation.
    Sajjadi B; Raman AA; Ibrahim S
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2015 May; 24():193-203. PubMed ID: 25435397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numerical simulation of acoustofluidic manipulation by radiation forces and acoustic streaming for complex particles.
    Hahn P; Leibacher I; Baasch T; Dual J
    Lab Chip; 2015 Nov; 15(22):4302-13. PubMed ID: 26448531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrasonic liquid metal processing: The essential role of cavitation bubbles in controlling acoustic streaming.
    Lebon GSB; Tzanakis I; Pericleous K; Eskin D; Grant PS
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2019 Jul; 55():243-255. PubMed ID: 30733147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Y-shaped jets driven by an ultrasonic beam reflecting on a wall.
    Moudjed B; Botton V; Henry D; Millet S; Ben Hadid H
    Ultrasonics; 2016 May; 68():33-42. PubMed ID: 26907890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D measurement and simulation of surface acoustic wave driven fluid motion: a comparison.
    Kiebert F; Wege S; Massing J; König J; Cierpka C; Weser R; Schmidt H
    Lab Chip; 2017 Jun; 17(12):2104-2114. PubMed ID: 28540945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional numerical simulation and experimental investigation of boundary-driven streaming in surface acoustic wave microfluidics.
    Chen C; Zhang SP; Mao Z; Nama N; Gu Y; Huang PH; Jing Y; Guo X; Costanzo F; Huang TJ
    Lab Chip; 2018 Dec; 18(23):3645-3654. PubMed ID: 30361727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic streaming induced by ultrasonic flexural vibrations and associated enhancement of convective heat transfer.
    Loh BG; Hyun S; Ro PI; Kleinstreuer C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Feb; 111(2):875-83. PubMed ID: 11863189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound transducers using acoustic streaming.
    Hariharan P; Myers MR; Robinson RA; Maruvada SH; Sliwa J; Banerjee RK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1706-19. PubMed ID: 18345858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PIV for the characterization of focused field induced acoustic streaming: seeding particle choice evaluation.
    Ben Haj Slama R; Gilles B; Ben Chiekh M; Béra JC
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Apr; 76():217-226. PubMed ID: 28135577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Acoustic Streaming Flow Patterns Induced by Solid, Liquid and Gas Obstructions.
    Lu HF; Tien WH
    Micromachines (Basel); 2020 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 32993101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applications of ultrasound streaming and radiation force in biosensors.
    Kuznetsova LA; Coakley WT
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2007 Mar; 22(8):1567-77. PubMed ID: 16979887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cavitation and acoustic streaming generated by different sonotrode tips.
    Fang Y; Yamamoto T; Komarov S
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2018 Nov; 48():79-87. PubMed ID: 30080589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.