These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18239356)

  • 1. Effects of MR image noise on estimation of short T2 values from T2 -weighted image series.
    Tawara N; Itoh A
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2007; 6(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 18239356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiple echo frequency-domain image contrast: improved signal-to-noise ratio and T2 (T2*) weighting.
    Yang QX; Demeure RJ; Dardzinski BJ; Arnold BW; Smith MB
    Magn Reson Med; 1999 Feb; 41(2):423-8. PubMed ID: 10080294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo MRI of the spine using parallel imaging.
    Ruel L; Brugières P; Luciani A; Breil S; Mathieu D; Rahmouni A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):749-55. PubMed ID: 14975981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of echo spacing and readout bandwidth on basic performances of EPI-fMRI acquisition sequences implemented on two 1.5 T MR scanner systems.
    Giannelli M; Diciotti S; Tessa C; Mascalchi M
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):303-10. PubMed ID: 20175493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Human Brain Using Readout-Segmented EPI and PROPELLER Turbo Spin Echo With Single-Shot EPI at 7 T MRI.
    Kida I; Ueguchi T; Matsuoka Y; Zhou K; Stemmer A; Porter D
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Jul; 51(7):435-9. PubMed ID: 26807895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 4 T and at 1.5 T: comparison of relaxation times and image contrast.
    Duewell SH; Ceckler TL; Ong K; Wen H; Jaffer FA; Chesnick SA; Balaban RS
    Radiology; 1995 Aug; 196(2):551-5. PubMed ID: 7617876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-quality multiple T(2)(*) contrast MR images from low-quality multi-echo images using temporal-domain denoising methods.
    Jang U; Hwang D
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):468-74. PubMed ID: 22225317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D-multi-echo radial imaging of
    Blunck Y; Josan S; Taqdees SW; Moffat BA; Ordidge RJ; Cleary JO; Johnston LA
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Apr; 79(4):1950-1961. PubMed ID: 28752556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose.
    Manka C; Träber F; Gieseke J; Schild HH; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):869-77. PubMed ID: 15665227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Weighted subtraction in 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging for visualization of short T2 tissues of the knee.
    Lee YH; Kim S; Song HT; Kim I; Suh JS
    Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 23934936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR imaging by using very short echo-time sequences after syngeneic lung transplantation in mice.
    Jungraithmayr W; Chuck N; Frauenfelder T; Weder W; Boss A
    Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):753-61. PubMed ID: 23047843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short T2 tissue imaging with the Pointwise Encoding Time reduction with Radial Acquisition (PETRA) sequence: the additional value of fat saturation and subtraction in the meniscus.
    Lee YH; Suh JS; Grodzki D
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 33(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 25614216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uterine tumors: comparison of 3D versus 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging at 3.0 T--initial experience.
    Hori M; Kim T; Onishi H; Ueguchi T; Tatsumi M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Tomoda K; Tomiyama N
    Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):154-63. PubMed ID: 21045182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved conductivity reconstruction from multi-echo MREIT utilizing weighted voxel-specific signal-to-noise ratios.
    Kim MN; Ha TY; Woo EJ; Kwon OI
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(11):3643-59. PubMed ID: 22596083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A consistency evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio in the quality assessment of human brain magnetic resonance images.
    Yu S; Dai G; Wang Z; Li L; Wei X; Xie Y
    BMC Med Imaging; 2018 May; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 29769079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?
    Schindera ST; Merkle EM; Dale BM; Delong DM; Nelson RC
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1236-43. PubMed ID: 16979073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High-SNR multiple T
    Eo T; Kim T; Jun Y; Lee H; Ahn SS; Kim DH; Hwang D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1835-1845. PubMed ID: 27635526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo 35Cl MR imaging in humans: a feasibility study.
    Nagel AM; Lehmann-Horn F; Weber MA; Jurkat-Rott K; Wolf MB; Radbruch A; Umathum R; Semmler W
    Radiology; 2014 May; 271(2):585-95. PubMed ID: 24495267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters.
    Dietrich O; Raya JG; Reeder SB; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Aug; 26(2):375-85. PubMed ID: 17622966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.