These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18240666)

  • 1. Development of a Zulu speech reception threshold test for Zulu first language speakers in Kwa Zulu-Natal.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Pillay M; Govender C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2007; 54():111-22. PubMed ID: 18240666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The homogeneity of audibility and prosody of Zulu words for speech reception threshold (SRT) testing.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Pillay M; Govender C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2009; 56():60-75. PubMed ID: 20235494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. First-language raters' opinions when validating word recordings for a newly developed speech reception threshold test.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Pillay M; Wilson W
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 Mar; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometrically equivalent bisyllabic words for speech recognition threshold testing in Vietnamese.
    Harris RW; McPherson DL; Hanson CM; Eggett DL
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Aug; 56(8):525-537. PubMed ID: 28388853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the South African Spondaic and CID W-1 wordlists for measuring speech recognition threshold.
    Hanekom T; Soer M; Pottas L
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2015 Jun; 62(1):E1-10. PubMed ID: 26304218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The internal and external consistency of a speech reception threshold test for isiZulu speakers with normal hearing sensitivity.
    Panday S; Kathard H; Pillay M; Wilson W
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 Jun; 65(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 30035610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digit speech reception threshold testing in Tswana/English speakers.
    Khoza K; Ramma L; Mophosho M; Moroka D
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2008; 55():20-8. PubMed ID: 19485066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development of psychometrically equivalent Cantonese speech audiometry materials.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Channell RW; Conklin B; Kim M; Wong L
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 21319936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise.
    Ozimek E; Kutzner D; Sek A; Wicher A
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(7):433-43. PubMed ID: 19925330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of speech reception threshold materials for speakers of Taiwan Mandarin.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Slade KB
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Aug; 46(8):449-58. PubMed ID: 17654087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining a Zulu core vocabulary for children who use augmentative and alternative communication.
    Mngomezulu J; Tönsing KM; Dada S; Bokaba NB
    Augment Altern Commun; 2019 Dec; 35(4):274-284. PubMed ID: 31835923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):729-41. PubMed ID: 19626512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychometrically equivalent Russian speech audiometry materials by male and female talkers.
    Harris RW; Nissen SL; Pola MG; McPherson DL; Tavartkiladze GA; Eggett DL
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Jan; 46(1):47-66. PubMed ID: 17365055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Analysis of disyllabic mandarin speech test results of normal hearing persons with different ages].
    Wang Y; Zhang H; Tong J; Guo J; Zheng Z; Wu W; Chen J; Li Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(7):312-5. PubMed ID: 22737873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Words and syllables in fluent speech segmentation by French-learning infants: an ERP study.
    Goyet L; de Schonen S; Nazzi T
    Brain Res; 2010 May; 1332():75-89. PubMed ID: 20331982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The benefit obtained from visually displayed text from an automatic speech recognizer during listening to speech presented in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):838-52. PubMed ID: 18633325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of the text reception threshold test: a visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test.
    Zekveld AA; George EL; Kramer SE; Goverts ST; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):576-84. PubMed ID: 17538101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of dialect on speech audiometry testing.
    Nissen SL; Harris RW; Channell RW; Richardson NE; Garlick JA; Eggett DL
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 22(2):233-40. PubMed ID: 23824434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comprehension of a novel accent by young and older listeners.
    Adank P; Janse E
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):736-40. PubMed ID: 20853978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.