95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18240748)
1. Common orthodontic appliances cause artifacts that degrade the diagnostic quality of CBCT images.
Sanders MA; Hoyjberg C; Chu CB; Leggitt VL; Kim JS
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2007 Dec; 35(12):850-7. PubMed ID: 18240748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
Hirschinger V; Hanke S; Hirschfelder U; Hofmann E
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Mar; 76(2):152-60, 162-3. PubMed ID: 25744093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images.
Elison JM; Leggitt VL; Thomson M; Oyoyo U; Wycliffe ND
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 18929275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging.
Wylezinska M; Pinkstone M; Hay N; Scott AD; Birch MJ; Miquel ME
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):610-7. PubMed ID: 25667040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments.
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional ultrashort echo magnetic resonance imaging of orthodontic appliances in the natural dentition.
Cox RJ; Kau CH; Rasche V
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):552-61. PubMed ID: 22999679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M
Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the effects of orthodontic materials, field of view, and artifact reduction mode on accuracy of CBCT-based caries detection.
Isman O; Aktan AM; Ertas ET
Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Jul; 24(7):2487-2496. PubMed ID: 31811495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of orthodontic brackets and permanent retainers on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans: A preliminary study.
Neela PK; Tatikonda VK; Syed MW; Mamillapalli PK; Sesham VM; Keesara S
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 34905303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro investigation on friction generated by ceramic brackets.
Tecco S; Teté S; Festa M; Festa F
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e133-44. PubMed ID: 21490982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of various orthodontic materials as foreign bodies via panoramic radiography, cone beam computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography: an in vitro study.
Isman O; Isman E
Oral Radiol; 2021 Jul; 37(3):524-530. PubMed ID: 34037939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances.
Rosvall MD; Fields HW; Ziuchkovski J; Rosenstiel SF; Johnston WM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):276.e1-12; discussion 276-7. PubMed ID: 19268820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Quantitative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Images with Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets and Arch Wires: An Ex Vivo Study.
Shavakhi M; Soltani P; Aghababaee G; Patini R; Armogida NG; Spagnuolo G; Valletta A
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 Jan; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 38248036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.
Doshi UH; Bhad-Patil WA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21195280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of magnetic resonance images of the head.
Zhylich D; Krishnan P; Muthusami P; Rayner T; Shroff M; Doria A; Tompson B; Lou W; Suri S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):484-499. PubMed ID: 28257733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments].
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Orthod Fr; 2017 Jun; 88(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 28597834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.
Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage under metallic and ceramic brackets bonded with orthodontic self-etching primer systems.
Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI; Ertas H
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1089-94. PubMed ID: 18947278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
