These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis. Martinez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Ozcan M; Pradies G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation. Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation. Apicella D; Veltri M; Chieffi N; Balleri P; Ferrari M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments. Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns. Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal adaptation of different types of all-ceramic partial coverage restorations after exposure to an artificial mouth. Stappert CF; Denner N; Gerds T; Strub JR Br Dent J; 2005 Dec; 199(12):779-83; discussion 777. PubMed ID: 16395369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns. Cho HW; Dong JK; Jin TH; Oh SC; Lee HH; Lee JW Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11887605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments. Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour. Larsson C Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments. Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of ceramic implant abutments in anterior restorations. Chen ZF; Nang PH; Wang Y; Luo ZB Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():67-70. PubMed ID: 22073456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants. Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection. Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 16955608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]