530 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18241217)
1. Marginal adaptation of all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.
Att W; Hoischen T; Gerds T; Strub JR
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 18241217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: an in vitro study.
Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 16473084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported all-ceramic restorations after exposure to the artificial mouth.
Att W; Kurun S; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 May; 33(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 16629897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns.
Wolf D; Bindl A; Schmidlin PR; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):609-17. PubMed ID: 18807555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
Martinez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Ozcan M; Pradies G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cement thickness at implant-supported single-tooth Lava assemblies: a scanning electron microscopic investigation.
Apicella D; Veltri M; Chieffi N; Balleri P; Ferrari M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jul; 21(7):747-50. PubMed ID: 20636729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal adaptation of different types of all-ceramic partial coverage restorations after exposure to an artificial mouth.
Stappert CF; Denner N; Gerds T; Strub JR
Br Dent J; 2005 Dec; 199(12):779-83; discussion 777. PubMed ID: 16395369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns.
Cho HW; Dong JK; Jin TH; Oh SC; Lee HH; Lee JW
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11887605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of ceramic implant abutments in anterior restorations.
Chen ZF; Nang PH; Wang Y; Luo ZB
Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun; 19():67-70. PubMed ID: 22073456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vitro evaluation of titanium, zirconia, and alumina procera abutments with hexagonal connection.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 16955608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
