These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1824159)
1. [Comparison of immunofluorescence, enzyme immunoassay and cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital infections]. Martínez A; Pinto E; Gaggero A; Arroyave R Rev Med Chil; 1991 Feb; 119(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 1824159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Chlamydia diagnosis in clinical practice. Chlamydia trachomatis EIA and direct immunofluorescence (MikroTak) in comparison with cell culture]. Gelzer D; Cathomas G; Bienz K; Rohrbach M; Viollier E; Rufli T Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1988 Feb; 118(7):223-6. PubMed ID: 3282301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparative evaluation of various direct and culture methods for the diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections]. Martelli P; Crovatto M; Gava G; Chiaradia V; Santini G Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1986 Mar; 22(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 3538126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen with an enzyme immunoassay]. Näher H; Hofmann H; Petzoldt D Hautarzt; 1986 Jan; 37(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 3512482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of diagnostic methods in adolescent girls with and without symptoms of Chlamydia urogenital infection. Biro FM; Reising SF; Doughman JA; Kollar LM; Rosenthal SL Pediatrics; 1994 Mar; 93(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 8115208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of culture, direct immunofluorescent antibody test and enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of urogenital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis. Dhar R; Lastimoza J; Dhar M; al-Akkad K; Chugh TD APMIS Suppl; 1988; 3():35-9. PubMed ID: 3052536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type. Chernesky M; Jang D; Sellors J; Castriciano S; Pickard L; Luinstra K; Mahony J Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 8108751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noninvasive detection of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men by a rapid enzyme immunoassay test. Ferris DG; Martin WH; Mathis DM; Steele JC; Fischer PM; Styslinger KM J Fam Pract; 1991 Jul; 33(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 1711571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary medicine clinic attendees: comparison of strand displacement amplification and the ligase chain reaction. McCartney RA; Walker J; Scoular A Br J Biomed Sci; 2001; 58(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 11788000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enzyme immunoassay in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in diverse patient groups. Bakir TM; Hossain A; De-Silva S; Siddiqui A; Sengupta BS; el-Sheikh MM; Bakir AF J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1989; 33(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 2671155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women. Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay (IDEIA) with tissue culture isolation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis using a single swab. Krech T; Gerhard-Fsadni D; Degen KW; Vossel R; Géraud GP Microbiologica; 1989 Apr; 12(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 2664432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae with DNA probe (a note). Széll A; Tisza T; Horváth A Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung; 1994; 41(3):291-3. PubMed ID: 7697325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections. Monno R; De Vito D; Vena GA; Mosca A; Miragliotta G Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women. Baselski VS; McNeeley SG; Ryan G; Robison M Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jul; 70(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3299179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens. Wu CH; Lee MF; Yin SC; Yang DM; Cheng SF Sex Transm Dis; 1992; 19(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1411833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR in genitourinary specimens from men and women attending an STD clinic. Bhalla P; Baveja UK; Chawla R; Saini S; Khaki P; Bhalla K; Mahajan S; Reddy BS J Commun Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18338709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Direct identification of Chlamydia trachomatis using fluorescent monoclonal antibodies in infections of the lower urogenital tract]. Morier P; Frenk E; Walzer C Ann Dermatol Venereol; 1986; 113(9):799-803. PubMed ID: 3548542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-invasive detection of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in asymptomatic males and females by enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme). Adjei O; Lal V J Trop Med Hyg; 1994 Feb; 97(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 8107174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections by a monoclonal antibody direct immunofluorescence test. Hossain A J Trop Med Hyg; 1987 Dec; 90(6):307-10. PubMed ID: 3323545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]