These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18242132)

  • 1. Radiation exposure during elective coronary angioplasty: the effect of flat-panel detection.
    Prasan AM; Ison G; Rees DM
    Heart Lung Circ; 2008 Jun; 17(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 18242132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Fluoroscopy time -- an overestimated factor for patient radiation exposure in invasive cardiology].
    Kuon E; Robinson DM; Empen K; Dahm JB
    Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 15902630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are new technologies always reducing patient doses in cardiac procedures?
    Trianni A; Bernardi G; Padovani R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 16461516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach.
    Lange HW; von Boetticher H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jan; 67(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16331696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Variations of radiation dosage delivered to patients undergoing interventional cardiological procedures. A monocentric study 2002-05].
    Georges JL; Livarek B; Gibault-Genty G; Messaoudi H; Aziza JP; Hautecoeur JL; Soleille H
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2007 Mar; 100(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17536420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increases in patient doses need to be avoided when upgrading interventional cardiology systems to flat detectors.
    Prieto C; Vano E; Fernández JM; Martínez D; Sánchez R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):83-5. PubMed ID: 21733865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measures of radiation exposure in cardiac imaging and the impact of case complexity.
    Smith IR; Rivers JT
    Heart Lung Circ; 2008 Jun; 17(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 18242136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation dose levels during interventional cardiology procedures in a tertiary care hospital.
    Dragusin O; Desmet W; Heidbuchel H; Padovani R; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):231-5. PubMed ID: 16461493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose reduction without compromise of image quality in cardiac angiography and intervention with the use of a flat panel detector without an antiscatter grid.
    Partridge J; McGahan G; Causton S; Bowers M; Mason M; Dalby M; Mitchell A
    Heart; 2006 Apr; 92(4):507-10. PubMed ID: 16159965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient dosimetry during coronary interventions: a comprehensive analysis.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Karvouni E; Kottou S; Tzanalaridou E; Korovesis S; Giazitzoglou E; Katritsis DG
    Am Heart J; 2004 Mar; 147(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 14999196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of a CCD and a flat-panel digital system in an Interventional Cardiology Laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):93-6. PubMed ID: 16461500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flat detectors and new aspects of radiation safety.
    Gurley JC
    Cardiol Clin; 2009 Aug; 27(3):385-94. PubMed ID: 19573712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reduction of the radiation exposure of patients caused by selected interventional and angiographic procedures].
    Seifert H; el-Jamal A; Roth R; Urbanczyk K; Kramann B
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 11199435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology.
    Kuon E; Dahm JB; Empen K; Robinson DM; Reuter G; Wucherer M
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Oct; 44(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 15464322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of radiation exposure of patients caused by selected interventional and angiography procedures--initial results].
    Seifert H; Roth R; Urbanczyk K; Kramann B
    Rofo; 1999 Feb; 170(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 10101360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient skin dosimetry in haemodynamic and electrophysiology interventional cardiology.
    Trianni A; Chizzola G; Toh H; Quai E; Cragnolini E; Bernardi G; Proclemer A; Padovani R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):241-6. PubMed ID: 16461492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors that influence radiation dose in percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Tsapaki V; Magginas A; Vano E; Kottou S; Papadakis E; Dafnomili P; Kyrozi E; Kollaros N; Neofotistou V; Cokkinos D
    J Interv Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 19(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 16724966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.