853 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18242359)
1. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.
Wu CF; Chen CS; Lin WY; Shee JJ; Lin CL; Chen Y; Huang WS
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 15893812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.
Salem HK
Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ureteroscopy and holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy as emergency treatment for acute renal failure caused by impacted ureteral calculi.
Jiang H; Wu Z; Ding Q
Urology; 2008 Sep; 72(3):504-7. PubMed ID: 18653216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Matched pair analysis of ureteroscopy vs. shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper ureteric calculi.
Stewart GD; Bariol SV; Moussa SA; Smith G; Tolley DA
Int J Clin Pract; 2007 May; 61(5):784-8. PubMed ID: 17386062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stent positioning after ureteroscopy for urinary calculi: the question is still open.
Damiano R; Autorino R; Esposito C; Cantiello F; Sacco R; de Sio M; D'Armiento M
Eur Urol; 2004 Sep; 46(3):381-7; discussion 387-8. PubMed ID: 15306112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pediatric urolithiasis: 15 years of local experience with minimally invasive endourological management of pediatric calculi.
Raza A; Turna B; Smith G; Moussa S; Tolley DA
J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):682-5. PubMed ID: 16006948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China.
Zhang J; Shi Q; Wang GZ; Wang F; Jiang N
Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21597268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Compare the outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with ureteroscopic management after failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi].
Wang DW; Wang JY; Cao XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 47(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 19570385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrograde endoscopic management of ureteral stones more than 2 cm in size.
Mugiya S; Ozono S; Nagata M; Takayama T; Nagae H
Urology; 2006 Jun; 67(6):1164-8; discussion 1168. PubMed ID: 16765171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective randomized comparison between shockwave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones <2 cm: a single center experience.
Kumar A; Nanda B; Kumar N; Kumar R; Vasudeva P; Mohanty NK
J Endourol; 2015 Jan; 29(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23914770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transureteral lithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in management of upper ureteral calculi: a comparative study.
Nikoobakht MR; Emamzadeh A; Abedi AR; Moradi K; Mehrsai A
Urol J; 2007; 4(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 18270943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.
Hautmann S; Friedrich MG; Fernandez S; Steuber T; Hammerer P; Braun PM; Jünemann KP; Huland H
Urol Int; 2004; 73(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 15539843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
