548 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18243170)
1. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.
Brown SD; Heathcote A
Cogn Psychol; 2008 Nov; 57(3):153-78. PubMed ID: 18243170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Getting more from accuracy and response time data: methods for fitting the linear ballistic accumulator.
Donkin C; Averell L; Brown S; Heathcote A
Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1095-110. PubMed ID: 19897817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models for response time with different conclusions about psychological mechanisms?
Heathcote A; Hayes B
Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Jun; 66(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22686161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A ballistic model of choice response time.
Brown S; Heathcote A
Psychol Rev; 2005 Jan; 112(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 15631590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification.
Brown SD; Marley AA; Donkin C; Heathcote A
Psychol Rev; 2008 Apr; 115(2):396-425. PubMed ID: 18426295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time.
Jones M; Dzhafarov EN
Psychol Rev; 2014 Jan; 121(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 24079307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tradeoffs and theory: the double-mediation model.
Scholten M; Sherman SJ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):237-61. PubMed ID: 16719652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating cognitive process and descriptive models of attitudes and preferences.
Hawkins GE; Marley AA; Heathcote A; Flynn TN; Louviere JJ; Brown SD
Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(4):701-35. PubMed ID: 24124986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accumulating advantages: A new conceptualization of rapid multiple choice.
van Ravenzwaaij D; Brown SD; Marley AAJ; Heathcote A
Psychol Rev; 2020 Mar; 127(2):186-215. PubMed ID: 31580104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The unexpected empirical consensus among consensus methods.
Regenwetter M; Kim A; Kantor A; Ho MH
Psychol Sci; 2007 Jul; 18(7):629-35. PubMed ID: 17614872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Decision strategy: effect of the proportion of total response time taken by choice reaction time].
Proteau L; Leroux M; Lévesque L; Girouard Y
Can J Appl Sport Sci; 1986 Dec; 11(4):191-204. PubMed ID: 3815710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Context effects in multi-alternative decision making: empirical data and a Bayesian model.
Hawkins G; Brown SD; Steyvers M; Wagenmakers EJ
Cogn Sci; 2012 Apr; 36(3):498-516. PubMed ID: 22257112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The multiattribute linear ballistic accumulator model of context effects in multialternative choice.
Trueblood JS; Brown SD; Heathcote A
Psychol Rev; 2014 Apr; 121(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 24730597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Choice in multi-alternative environments: a trial-by-trial implementation of the sequential choice model.
Vasconcelos M; Monteiro T; Aw J; Kacelnik A
Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):435-9. PubMed ID: 19948210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Heuristic and linear models of judgment: matching rules and environments.
Hogarth RM; Karelaia N
Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):733-58. PubMed ID: 17638504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-stage dynamic signal detection: a theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.
Pleskac TJ; Busemeyer JR
Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):864-901. PubMed ID: 20658856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A parallel accumulator model accounts for decision randomness when deciding on risky prospects with different expected value.
Howlett JR; Paulus MP
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0233761. PubMed ID: 32702026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decision processes and the slowing of simple choices in schizophrenia.
Heathcote A; Suraev A; Curley S; Gong Q; Love J; Michie PT
J Abnorm Psychol; 2015 Nov; 124(4):961-974. PubMed ID: 26595475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bayes factors for the linear ballistic accumulator model of decision-making.
Evans NJ; Brown SD
Behav Res Methods; 2018 Apr; 50(2):589-603. PubMed ID: 28455795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disentangling decision models: from independence to competition.
Teodorescu AR; Usher M
Psychol Rev; 2013 Jan; 120(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 23356779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
