These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1824452)

  • 1. Failure to document.
    Kardos GG
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1991; 6(3):99-103. PubMed ID: 1824452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical record review for clinical pertinence.
    Lewis KS
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Aug; 12(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10112162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Charting a course toward legible medical records. Perfect paperwork can mean financial savings, better patient care.
    Weber DO
    Physician Exec; 2002; 28(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 11806236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving physician documentation through a clinical documentation management program.
    Hicks TA; Gentleman CA
    Nurs Adm Q; 2003; 27(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 14649019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Best practices for improving revenue capture through documentation.
    Richter E; Shelton A; Yu Y
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2007 Jun; 61(6):44-7. PubMed ID: 17571707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Best practices in record completion.
    Doyon C
    J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 15500017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Altered medication orders in medical records.
    Hosp Pharm; 1987 Mar; 22(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 10281369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practice Brief. Ensuring legibility of patient records.
    Glondys B;
    J AHIMA; 2003 May; 74(5):64A-64D. PubMed ID: 12747151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving the quality of medical record documentation.
    Martin CA
    J Healthc Qual; 1992; 14(3):16-23. PubMed ID: 10119893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using physician profiling to improve documentation.
    Hammen C
    J AHIMA; 2001 Mar; 72(3):19-20. PubMed ID: 11255829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk management: role of the medical record department.
    Feather H; Morgan N
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Nov; 12(2):40-8. PubMed ID: 10114765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why endure frustration? Medical records need cooperative overhaul.
    Cornelius M
    Mod Healthc; 1993 Mar; 23(9):33. PubMed ID: 10124250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical pertinence review.
    QRC Advis; 1989 Nov; 6(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10295774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are we overwhelming physicians with medical record review?
    Spath PL
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Feb; 56(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 10289611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structuring peer review.
    QRC Advis; 1989 Feb; 5(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 10292753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The importance of documentation in peer review.
    Kingsley DI
    N J Med; 1989 Mar; 86(3):185-6. PubMed ID: 2704433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Avoiding unnecessary peer review.
    Nelson KM
    QA Rev; 1991; 3(3):1, 8. PubMed ID: 10115142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical documentation and the ED record: the key components.
    Hill MB
    QRC Advis; 1991 Jun; 7(9):1-6. PubMed ID: 10111921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Team approach to charting: medical staff join in.
    Rice J; Rother C
    Leadersh Health Serv; 1994; 3(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 10135113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical staff monitoring functions: medical record review.
    JCAH Perspect; 1985; 5(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 10289639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.