These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18244875)

  • 1. Hierarchical semi-numeric method for pairwise fuzzy group decision making.
    Marimin M; Umano M; Hatono I; Tamura H
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2002; 32(5):691-700. PubMed ID: 18244875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linguistic labels for expressing fuzzy preference relations in fuzzy group decision making.
    Marimin M; Umano M; Hatono I; Tamura H
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 1998; 28(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 18255937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of health-care waste disposal methods using a VIKOR-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method.
    Liu HC; Wu J; Li P
    Waste Manag; 2013 Dec; 33(12):2744-51. PubMed ID: 24011433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information systems for landfill site selection: a case study using ordered weighted average.
    Gorsevski PV; Donevska KR; Mitrovski CD; Frizado JP
    Waste Manag; 2012 Feb; 32(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 22030279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A fuzzy parametric model for decision making involving F-OWA operator with unknown weights environment.
    Touqeer M; Sulaie SA; Lone SA; Shaheen K; Gunaime NM; Elkotb MA
    Heliyon; 2023 Sep; 9(9):e19969. PubMed ID: 37809988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria group decision-making and most suitable biomedical material selection.
    Kirişci M; Demir I; Şimşek N
    Artif Intell Med; 2022 May; 127():102278. PubMed ID: 35430046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of multiattribute decision-making methods for the determination of relative significance factor of impact categories.
    Noh J; Lee KM
    Environ Manage; 2003 May; 31(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 12719893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fuzzy Group Consensus Decision Making and Its Use in Selecting Energy-Saving and Low-carbon Technology Schemes in Star Hotels.
    Lu P; Yang X; Wang ZJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Sep; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 30235887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making approach for industrial green engineering.
    Chiou HK; Tzeng GH
    Environ Manage; 2002 Dec; 30(6):816-30. PubMed ID: 12402097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flexibility Degree of Fuzzy Numbers and its Implication to a Group-Decision-Making Model.
    Liu F; Pedrycz W; Liu XW
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2019 Dec; 49(12):4054-4065. PubMed ID: 30059328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Hierarchical Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Evaluating Performances of Low-Carbon Tourism Scenic Spots.
    Yang X; Wang ZJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32872106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical Waste Disposal Method Selection Based on a Hierarchical Decision Model with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Relations.
    Qian W; Wang ZJ; Li KW
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Sep; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 27618082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity analysis of the OWA operator.
    Zarghami M; Szidarovszky F; Ardakanian R
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2008 Apr; 38(2):547-52. PubMed ID: 18348936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Allocating resources for cancer control--resolving multicriteria decision-making using the analytic hierarchy process].
    Gróf A
    Magy Onkol; 2007; 51(3):197-208. PubMed ID: 17922059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An experimental comparison of fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process for medical decision support systems.
    Uzoka FM; Obot O; Barker K; Osuji J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jul; 103(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 20633949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Based AHP and Fuzzy COPRAS for Machine Tool Evaluation.
    Nguyen HT; Md Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Aoyama H; Case K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0133599. PubMed ID: 26368541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new approach to aid urban water management decision making using trade-off sacrifice modelled by fuzzy logic.
    Lai E; Lundie S; Ashbolt NJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):11-20. PubMed ID: 17978428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TOPSIS-based consensus model for group decision-making with incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations.
    Liu F; Zhang WG
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2014 Aug; 44(8):1283-94. PubMed ID: 24081882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures.
    Promentilla MA; Furuichi T; Ishii K; Tanikawa N
    J Environ Manage; 2008 Aug; 88(3):479-95. PubMed ID: 17467879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.