These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18245790)

  • 1. Commissioning and constancy protocols for digital angiographic units.
    Tsapaki V; Padovani R; Vano E; Schreiner A; Molfetas M; Neofotistou V; Kottou S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):258-60. PubMed ID: 18245790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. X-ray angiography systems.
    Health Devices; 1993 Nov; 22(11):507-54. PubMed ID: 8119801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Digital subtraction angiography].
    Gmelin E; Arlart IP
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1987; 126():1-192. PubMed ID: 2886105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The quality assurance and constancy checking of fluoroscopy and fluorography systems.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):49-52. PubMed ID: 11487842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality control measurements for fluoroscopy systems in eight countries participating in the SENTINEL EU coordination action.
    Zoetelief J; Schultz FW; Kottou S; Gray L; O'Connor U; Salat D; Kepler K; Kaplanis P; Jankowski J; Schreiner A; Vassileva J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):237-43. PubMed ID: 18310607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changing from image intensifier to flat detector technology for interventional cardiology procedures: a practical point of view.
    Bokou C; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Breisch R; Beissel J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):83-6. PubMed ID: 18448437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Digital peripheral angiography with pace shifting and subtraction. Comparison with the standard procedure].
    Hilbertz T; Fink U; Beck R; Berger H; Eberwein U
    Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1912540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk factors of radiation dose in patients undergoing peripherally-inserted central catheter procedure using conventional angiography equipment and flat panel detector-based mobile C-arm fluoroscopy.
    Lee T; Shin SW; Choi D; Cho SK; Hyun D; Do YS; Jeon S; Cha B; Bok EK; Kim S
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1234-8. PubMed ID: 24292900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Dose reduction by several measures in X-ray angiographic system].
    Saito T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 12766287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic Tube Potential Selection with Tube Current Modulation (APSCM) in coronary CT angiography: Comparison of image quality and radiation dose with conventional body mass index-based protocol.
    Park YJ; Kim YJ; Lee JW; Kim HY; Hong YJ; Lee HJ; Hur J; Nam JE; Choi BW
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 22551594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Some aspects on radiation protection in conventional and digital radiology in Romania.
    Milu C; Dumitrescu A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):346-9. PubMed ID: 18381334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two angiographic systems in paediatric interventional cardiology.
    Ubeda C; Vano E; Miranda P; Aguirre D; Riquelme N; Guarda E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):250-3. PubMed ID: 25843951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does digital imaging decrease patient dose? A pilot study and review of the literature.
    Neofotistou V; Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):204-10. PubMed ID: 16464833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.