2467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18246016)
1. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain.
Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An economic model of one-level lumbar arthroplasty versus fusion.
Guyer RD; Tromanhauser SG; Regan JJ
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):558-62. PubMed ID: 17588819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial.
Delamarter RB; Fribourg DM; Kanim LE; Bae H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S167-75. PubMed ID: 14560188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On total disc replacement.
Berg S
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2011 Feb; 82(343):1-29. PubMed ID: 21542779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lumbar spinal fusion versus anterior lumbar disc replacement: the financial implications.
Patel VV; Estes S; Lindley EM; Burger E
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Oct; 21(7):473-6. PubMed ID: 18836357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II.
Zigler JE
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):260S-267S. PubMed ID: 15541675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels.
Siepe CJ; Mayer HM; Heinz-Leisenheimer M; Korge A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):782-90. PubMed ID: 17414914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Circumferential fusion is dominant over posterolateral fusion in a long-term perspective: cost-utility evaluation of a randomized controlled trial in severe, chronic low back pain.
Soegaard R; Bünger CE; Christiansen T; Høy K; Eiskjaer SP; Christensen FB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):2405-14. PubMed ID: 18090078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Financial incentives for lumbar surgery: a critical analysis of physician reimbursement for decompression and fusion procedures.
Whang PG; Lim MR; Sasso RC; Skelton A; Brown ZB; Greg Anderson D; Albert TJ; Hilibrand AS; Vaccaro AR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 18679090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of surgical volume and the early experience with lumbar total disc replacement as part of the investigational device exemption study of the Charité Artificial Disc.
Regan JJ; McAfee PC; Blumenthal SL; Guyer RD; Geisler FH; Garcia R; Maxwell JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):2270-6. PubMed ID: 16946666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acute hospital costs after minimally invasive versus open lumbar interbody fusion: data from a US national database with 6106 patients.
Wang MY; Lerner J; Lesko J; McGirt MJ
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Aug; 25(6):324-8. PubMed ID: 21685806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Hannibal M; Thomas DJ; Low J; Hsu KY; Zucherman J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(21):2322-6. PubMed ID: 17906573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective randomized study of the Charite artificial disc: data from two investigational centers.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Hochschuler SH; Blumenthal SL; Fedder IL; Ohnmeiss DD; Cunningham BW
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):252S-259S. PubMed ID: 15541674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Kershaw T; Shah RV; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Nanieva R; Karg A; Husted DS; Emerson JW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):992-7. PubMed ID: 16641775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.
Zigler J; Delamarter R; Spivak JM; Linovitz RJ; Danielson GO; Haider TT; Cammisa F; Zuchermann J; Balderston R; Kitchel S; Foley K; Watkins R; Bradford D; Yue J; Yuan H; Herkowitz H; Geiger D; Bendo J; Peppers T; Sachs B; Girardi F; Kropf M; Goldstein J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. PubMed ID: 17495770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature.
Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
