146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18246024)
1. Re: Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak J, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 2007;32:1155-62.
Fairbank J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2929-30; author reply 2930-1. PubMed ID: 18246024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.
Zigler J; Delamarter R; Spivak JM; Linovitz RJ; Danielson GO; Haider TT; Cammisa F; Zuchermann J; Balderston R; Kitchel S; Foley K; Watkins R; Bradford D; Yue J; Yuan H; Herkowitz H; Geiger D; Bendo J; Peppers T; Sachs B; Girardi F; Kropf M; Goldstein J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. PubMed ID: 17495770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Commentary on an article by Rick Delamarter, MD, et al.: "Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level degenerative lumbar disc disease. Results at twenty-four months".
Schoenfeld AJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):e41. PubMed ID: 21398573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Lumbar spine arthroplasty using the ProDisc II.
Zigler JE
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):260S-267S. PubMed ID: 15541675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: "prospective, randomized multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar tool disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up".
Guyer RD
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):360; author reply 361-3. PubMed ID: 20362255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Re: Sasso R, Heller J, Hacker B, Smucker J. Artificial disc versus fusion. A prospective, randomized study with 2-years follow-up on 99 patients. Spine 2007;32:2933-40.
Botelho RV
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):1156-7; author reply 1157. PubMed ID: 18449052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial intervertebral disc arthroplasty for treatment of degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine.
Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2011 Nov; 26(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 22724162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of surgical volume and the early experience with lumbar total disc replacement as part of the investigational device exemption study of the Charité Artificial Disc.
Regan JJ; McAfee PC; Blumenthal SL; Guyer RD; Geisler FH; Garcia R; Maxwell JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19):2270-6. PubMed ID: 16946666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial intervertebral disc arthroplasty for treatment of degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine.
Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2008 Feb; 22(12):1-4. PubMed ID: 18411503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Hannibal M; Thomas DJ; Low J; Hsu KY; Zucherman J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(21):2322-6. PubMed ID: 17906573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artificial intervertebral disc arthroplasty for treatment of degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine.
Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2009 Aug; 24(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 19824220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis.
Anderson PA; Sasso RC; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1305-12. PubMed ID: 18496341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Bryan cervical disc system.
Papadopoulos S
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):629-36, vi. PubMed ID: 16326286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical disc arthroplasty: general introduction.
Acosta FL; Ames CP
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):603-7, vi. PubMed ID: 16326283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ProDisc artificial disc: insertion technique.
Aryan HE; Acosta FL; Ames CP
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):651-6, vii. PubMed ID: 16326288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disc arthroplasty: lessons learned from total joint arthroplasty.
Santos EG; Polly DW; Mehbod AA; Saleh KJ
Spine J; 2004; 4(6 Suppl):182S-189S. PubMed ID: 15541665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
Sasso RC; Best NM; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Charité Artificial Disc: insertion technique.
Aryan HE; Acosta FL; Ames CP
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):637-50, vii. PubMed ID: 16326287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
