These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18246364)

  • 1. Analysis of forces applied during microlaryngoscopy: a descriptive study.
    Gugatschka M; Gerstenberger C; Friedrich G
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 265(9):1083-7. PubMed ID: 18246364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Curved rigid laryngoscope: missing link between direct suspension laryngoscopy and indirect techniques?
    Friedrich G; Kiesler K; Gugatschka M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Oct; 266(10):1583-8. PubMed ID: 19350256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of pressure applied during microlaryngoscopy.
    Fang R; Chen H; Sun J
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 269(5):1471-6. PubMed ID: 22271280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laryngeal Force Sensor: Quantifying Extralaryngeal Complications after Suspension Microlaryngoscopy.
    Feng AL; Song PC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Aug; 159(2):328-334. PubMed ID: 29613830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does experience influence the forces exerted on maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy? A manikin study using the Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Bucx MJ; van Geel RT; Wegener JT; Robers C; Stijnen T
    Can J Anaesth; 1995 Feb; 42(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 7720158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of head positioning on the forces occurring during microlaryngoscopy.
    Friedrich G; Gugatschka M
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Jul; 266(7):999-1003. PubMed ID: 19184077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of forces applied during Macintosh direct laryngoscopy compared with GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy.
    Russell T; Khan S; Elman J; Katznelson R; Cooper RM
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 22352799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of forces during laryngoscopy.
    Bucx MJ; Scheck PA; Van Geel RT; Den Ouden AH; Niesing R
    Anaesthesia; 1992 Apr; 47(4):348-51. PubMed ID: 1519691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preoperative clinical predictors of difficult laryngeal exposure for microlaryngoscopy: the Laryngoscore.
    Piazza C; Mangili S; Bon FD; Paderno A; Grazioli P; Barbieri D; Perotti P; Garofolo S; Nicolai P; Peretti G
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124(11):2561-7. PubMed ID: 24964904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the forces applied to a manikin during laryngoscopy with the GlideScope and Macintosh laryngoscopes.
    Russell T; Lee C; Firat M; Cooper RM
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2011 Nov; 39(6):1098-102. PubMed ID: 22165365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lower maximum forces on oral structures when using gum-elastic bougie than when using endotracheal tube and stylet during both direct and indirect laryngoscopy by novices: a crossover study using a high-fidelity simulator.
    Ono Y; Shinohara K; Shimada J; Inoue S; Kotani J
    BMC Emerg Med; 2020 May; 20(1):34. PubMed ID: 32375651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Contact Force Exerted on Teeth by Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope Versus Video Laryngoscopes.
    Kato Y; Sakuma Y; Momota Y
    Anesth Prog; 2018; 65(3):151-155. PubMed ID: 30235428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Indirect videolaryngoscopy using Macintosh blades in patients with non-anticipated difficult airways results in significantly lower forces exerted on teeth relative to classic direct laryngoscopy: a randomized crossover trial.
    Pieters B; Maassen R; Van Eig E; Maathuis B; Van Den Dobbelsteen J; Van Zundert A
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2015 Aug; 81(8):846-54. PubMed ID: 25311949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of forces applied using a Macintosh direct laryngoscope compared with a Glidescope video laryngoscope in patients with predictors of difficult laryngoscopy: A randomised controlled trial.
    Cordovani D; Russell T; Wee W; Suen A; Cooper RM
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2019 Mar; 36(3):221-226. PubMed ID: 30308524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new device for measuring and recording the forces applied during laryngoscopy.
    McCoy EP; Austin BA; Mirakhur RK; Wong KC
    Anaesthesia; 1995 Feb; 50(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 7710025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting laryngeal exposure in microlaryngoscopy: External validation of the laryngoscore.
    Tirelli G; Gatto A; Fortunati A; Marzolino R; Giudici F; Boscolo Nata F
    Laryngoscope; 2019 Jun; 129(6):1438-1443. PubMed ID: 30511499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Direct video-laryngoscopy].
    Milanesi I; Milanesi U
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1990; 10(4):327-35. PubMed ID: 2103086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forces acting on the maxillary incisor teeth during laryngoscopy using the Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Bucx MJ; Snijders CJ; van Geel RT; Robers C; van de Giessen H; Erdmann W; Stijnen T
    Anaesthesia; 1994 Dec; 49(12):1064-70. PubMed ID: 7864323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rescue microlaryngoscopy: a protocol for utilization of four techniques in overcoming challenging exposures in microlaryngeal surgery.
    Cheng J; Woo P
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):590-5. PubMed ID: 22578436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suspension laryngoscopy revisited.
    Zeitels SM; Burns JA; Dailey SH
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2004 Jan; 113(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 14763566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.