230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18246943)
1. EPA's 2006 human-subjects rule for pesticide experiments.
Shrader-Frechette K
Account Res; 2007; 14(4):211-54. PubMed ID: 18246943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protection for subjects in human research. Final rule.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Fed Regist; 2006 Feb; 71(24):6137-76. PubMed ID: 16502536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pesticide firms ask to use human data to assess safety.
Reichhardt T
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):200-1. PubMed ID: 12529604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Agency proposes major expansion of its regulations for human subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Oct; 20(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 16358477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Toxicology. Academy panel mulls ethics of human pesticide experiments.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Jan; 299(5605):327-9. PubMed ID: 12531989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethics. Human health research ethics.
Silbergeld E; Lerman S; Hushka L
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):949. PubMed ID: 15310879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pesticide testing. EPA draft rules for human subjects draw fire.
Stokstad E
Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5732):232. PubMed ID: 16002591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Toxicology. House would foil human pesticide studies.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 May; 308(5726):1234. PubMed ID: 15919959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protection of human subjects in "third party" experiments.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Mar; 17(3):4. PubMed ID: 12408151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Beyond compliance...is it too much to ask?
Koski G
IRB; 2003; 25(5):5-6. PubMed ID: 14870726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects.
Moore DL
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Flawed ethics recommendations of the U.S. EPA's human studies review board.
Shrader-Frechette K
Environ Health Perspect; 2007 Jan; 115(1):A17-8. PubMed ID: 17370367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional review board (IRB) violated numerous regulations.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 12530381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A review of OHRP compliance oversight letters.
Borror K; Carome M; McNeilly P; Weil C
IRB; 2003; 25(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 14870724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. US set to endorse human pesticide testing.
Wadman M
Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7055):24-5. PubMed ID: 16136104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pesticide toxicity, human subjects, and the Environmental Protection Agency's dilemma.
Robertson HG; Gorovitz S
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2000; 16(2):427-58. PubMed ID: 10921235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Who's watching the watchdogs? Responding to the erosion of research ethics by enforcing promises.
Alvino LA
Columbia Law Rev; 2003; 103():893-924. PubMed ID: 15732202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regulatory policy. Congress moves toward strengthening EPA's hand on chemical safety.
Stokstad E
Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5977):417. PubMed ID: 20413468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Action research in public schools: is it research? Should it be reviewed?
Sigler E
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Jun; 4(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 19480588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
