These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18246943)

  • 21. Standards for pesticide containers and containment: the EPA-proposed rule and potential impact on the GLPs. Proposed Rule 40 CFR 165 Subpart F--nonrefillable container standards: container design and residue removal, Federal Register Vol. 59, No. 29, February 11, 1994.
    Harrison WM
    Qual Assur; 1994 Dec; 3(4):379-81. PubMed ID: 7613748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. EPA accused of conflict of interest over chemicals study.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7013):6. PubMed ID: 15525949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Indecision over human pesticide data.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 1999 Sep; 5(9):972. PubMed ID: 10471263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. US Senate votes to ban pesticide tests on humans.
    Wadman M
    Nat Med; 2005 Aug; 11(8):811. PubMed ID: 16079861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
    Noah BA
    J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pesticide registration in the United States: overview and new directions.
    Culleen LE
    Qual Assur; 1994 Sep; 3(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 7804650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. University denies that it failed to comply with special rule for subjects who are prisoners.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Jan; 17(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 16270439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Are new laws needed to protect human subjects?
    Zucker C
    Account Res; 2001; 8(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 12481767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Agency expands its human subject protections but questions remain.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Aug; 21(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 17058814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Case study: university finally can resume human subjects research again.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2006 Aug; 21(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 17058815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Human subject protections in the United States: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks.
    Russell-Einhorn M; Ellis GB
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 12739540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Parents say federal agency helps protect researchers from more than their subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2000 Oct; 15(10):5-6. PubMed ID: 11913435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. University later admits that regulations were not followed.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2002 Feb; 17(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Human pesticide testing gets qualified OK.
    Renner R
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 May; 38(10):175A-176A. PubMed ID: 15212239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Are human research subjects safe enough?
    Thompson RE
    Physician Exec; 2003; 29(4):52-4. PubMed ID: 14650072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Central ethical dilemmas in research involving children.
    Tauer CA
    Account Res; 2002; 9(3-4):127-42. PubMed ID: 12816123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Financial conflicts of interest in human subjects research: proposals for a more effective regulatory scheme.
    Jordan KA
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 2003; 60(1):15-109. PubMed ID: 16273696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
    Ross LF
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.