173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18247064)
21. Anterior-posterior length discrepancy of the spinal column in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-a 3D CT study.
Brink RC; Schlösser TPC; van Stralen M; Vincken KL; Kruyt MC; Hui SCN; Viergever MA; Chu WCW; Cheng JCY; Castelein RM
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2259-2265. PubMed ID: 29730457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Indices of torso asymmetry related to spinal deformity in scoliosis.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Oct; 17(8):559-68. PubMed ID: 12243715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optoelectronic evaluation of trunk deformity in scoliosis.
Dawson EG; Kropf MA; Purcell G; Kabo JM; Kanim LE; Burt C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Mar; 18(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 8475431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis.
Goldberg CJ; Kaliszer M; Moore DP; Fogarty EE; Dowling FE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Feb; 26(4):E55-63. PubMed ID: 11224901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. 3D Deformation Patterns of S Shaped Elastic Rods as a Pathogenesis Model for Spinal Deformity in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Pasha S
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16485. PubMed ID: 31712762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluating the role of surface topography in the surveillance of scoliosis.
Applebaum A; Ference R; Cho W
Spine Deform; 2020 Jun; 8(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 31965557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Difference in whole spinal alignment between supine and standing positions in patients with adult spinal deformity using a new comparison method with slot-scanning three-dimensional X-ray imager and computed tomography through digital reconstructed radiography.
Hasegawa K; Okamoto M; Hatsushikano S; Caseiro G; Watanabe K
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Dec; 19(1):437. PubMed ID: 30522465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of trunk position on back surface-contour measured by raster stereophotography.
Liu XC; Thometz JG; Lyon RM; McGrady L
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2002 Jul; 31(7):402-6. PubMed ID: 12180626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surface topography and vectors: a new measure for the three dimensional quantification of scoliotic deformity.
Goldberg CJ; Grove D; Moore DP; Fogarty EE; Dowling FE
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 123():449-55. PubMed ID: 17108467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part II: relation between spinal deformity and patient outcomes.
Watanabe K; Hasegawa K; Hirano T; Uchiyama S; Endo N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(10):1202-5. PubMed ID: 15897836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A reduced micro-dose protocol for 3D reconstruction of the spine in children with scoliosis: results of a phantom-based and clinically validated study using stereo-radiography.
Pedersen PH; Vergari C; Alzakri A; Vialle R; Skalli W
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1874-1881. PubMed ID: 30350165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Global geometric torsion estimation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Kadoury S; Shen J; Parent S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2014 Apr; 52(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 24370854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Determination of the human spine curve based on laser triangulation.
Poredoš P; Čelan D; Možina J; Jezeršek M
BMC Med Imaging; 2015 Feb; 15(1):2. PubMed ID: 25651841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multicenter Comparison of 3D Spinal Measurements Using Surface Topography With Those From Conventional Radiography.
Knott P; Sturm P; Lonner B; Cahill P; Betsch M; McCarthy R; Kelly M; Lenke L; Betz R
Spine Deform; 2016 Mar; 4(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 27927552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Calculation of 3-D deformity in scoliosis by MRI of the total spine in two perpendicular reconstructed planes].
Gassel F; Schmitz A; Koenig R; Jaeger U; Heinemann C; Schmitt O
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2002; 140(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 12029588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantifier variables of the back surface deformity obtained with a noninvasive structured light method: evaluation of their usefulness in idiopathic scoliosis diagnosis.
Mínguez MF; Buendía M; Cibrián RM; Salvador R; Laguía M; Martín A; Gomar F
Eur Spine J; 2007 Jan; 16(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 16609858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rasterstereographic back shape analysis in idiopathic scoliosis after posterior correction and fusion.
Hackenberg L; Hierholzer E; Pötzl W; Götze C; Liljenqvist U
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Dec; 18(10):883-9. PubMed ID: 14580831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Early detection of progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by measurement of changes in back shape with the Integrated Shape Imaging System scanner.
Theologis TN; Fairbank JC; Turner-Smith AR; Pantazopoulos T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jun; 22(11):1223-7; discussion 1228. PubMed ID: 9201860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Double Rib Contour Sign (DRCS) in lateral spinal radiographs: aetiologic implications for scoliosis.
Grivas TB; Dangas S; Polyzois BD; Samelis P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():38-43. PubMed ID: 15456003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
McKenna C; Wade R; Faria R; Yang H; Stirk L; Gummerson N; Sculpher M; Woolacott N
Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(14):1-188. PubMed ID: 22449757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
