These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18247354)

  • 1. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function for protein-protein recognition.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2008 Aug; 72(2):557-79. PubMed ID: 18247354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    J Comput Chem; 2006 Nov; 27(15):1866-75. PubMed ID: 16983673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An iterative knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions: II. Validation of the scoring function.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    J Comput Chem; 2006 Nov; 27(15):1876-82. PubMed ID: 16983671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A knowledge-based scoring function for protein-RNA interactions derived from a statistical mechanics-based iterative method.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Apr; 42(7):e55. PubMed ID: 24476917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ITScore-NL: An Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Nucleic Acid-Ligand Interactions.
    Feng Y; Huang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6698-6708. PubMed ID: 33291885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Functions Derived from Rigid and Flexible Decoy Structures: Evaluation with the 2013 and 2014 CSAR Benchmarks.
    Yan C; Grinter SZ; Merideth BR; Ma Z; Zou X
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1013-21. PubMed ID: 26389744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scoring and lessons learned with the CSAR benchmark using an improved iterative knowledge-based scoring function.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2097-106. PubMed ID: 21830787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical mechanics-based method to extract atomic distance-dependent potentials from protein structures.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    Proteins; 2011 Sep; 79(9):2648-61. PubMed ID: 21732421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting protein complex geometries with a neural network.
    Chae MH; Krull F; Lorenzen S; Knapp EW
    Proteins; 2010 Mar; 78(4):1026-39. PubMed ID: 19938153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Interactions by Considering Binding Affinity Information.
    Zhao X; Li H; Zhang K; Huang SY
    J Phys Chem B; 2023 Oct; 127(42):9021-9034. PubMed ID: 37822259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.
    Huang SY; Zou X
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Feb; 50(2):262-73. PubMed ID: 20088605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of an effective scoring function for RNA-RNA interactions with a physics-based double-iterative method.
    Yan Y; Wen Z; Zhang D; Huang SY
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 May; 46(9):e56. PubMed ID: 29506237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An accurate, residue-level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance-scaled, ideal-gas reference state.
    Zhang C; Liu S; Zhou H; Zhou Y
    Protein Sci; 2004 Feb; 13(2):400-11. PubMed ID: 14739325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.
    Fan H; Schneidman-Duhovny D; Irwin JJ; Dong G; Shoichet BK; Sali A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Dec; 51(12):3078-92. PubMed ID: 22014038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. DECK: Distance and environment-dependent, coarse-grained, knowledge-based potentials for protein-protein docking.
    Liu S; Vakser IA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul; 12():280. PubMed ID: 21745398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A combinatorial scoring function for protein-RNA docking.
    Zhang Z; Lu L; Zhang Y; Hua Li C; Wang CX; Zhang XY; Tan JJ
    Proteins; 2017 Apr; 85(4):741-752. PubMed ID: 28120375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complex-type-dependent scoring functions in protein-protein docking.
    Li CH; Ma XH; Shen LZ; Chang S; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Aug; 129(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 17540496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
    Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating the importance of Delaunay-based definition of atomic interactions in scoring of protein-protein docking results.
    Jafari R; Sadeghi M; Mirzaie M
    J Mol Graph Model; 2016 May; 66():108-14. PubMed ID: 27060891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scoring confidence index: statistical evaluation of ligand binding mode predictions.
    Zavodszky MI; Stumpff-Kane AW; Lee DJ; Feig M
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2009 May; 23(5):289-99. PubMed ID: 19153808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.