These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18247646)

  • 1. Perceiving the speech of multiple concurrent talkers in a combined divided and selective attention task.
    Shafiro V; Gygi B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):EL229-35. PubMed ID: 18247646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of target-masker contextual similarity on the multimasker penalty in a three-talker diotic listening task.
    Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):2998-10. PubMed ID: 21110595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech.
    Francis AL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention fails to alter the dichotic listening lag effect: evidence that the lag effect is preattentional.
    Wood S; Hiscock M; Widrig M
    Brain Lang; 2000 Feb; 71(3):373-90. PubMed ID: 10716868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD; Ericson MA; Scott KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2527-38. PubMed ID: 11757942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and magnitude of laterality effects in dichotic listening with exogenous cueing.
    Voyer D
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):495-6. PubMed ID: 15223195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial and temporal modifications of multitalker speech can improve speech perception in older adults.
    Gygi B; Shafiro V
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():76-86. PubMed ID: 24530609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1724. PubMed ID: 17927432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Within-ear and across-ear interference in a cocktail-party listening task.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2985-95. PubMed ID: 12509020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tune in or tune out: age-related differences in listening to speech in music.
    Russo FA; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):746-60. PubMed ID: 18596643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural bases of talker normalization.
    Wong PC; Nusbaum HC; Small SL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1173-84. PubMed ID: 15453972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers.
    Brungart DS; Chang PS; Simpson BD; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4006-22. PubMed ID: 19507982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.
    Mattys SL; Brooks J; Cooke M
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Nov; 59(3):203-43. PubMed ID: 19423089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of speaking rate on the identification of word boundaries.
    Schwab S; Miller JL; Grosjean F; Mondini M
    Phonetica; 2008; 65(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 18679044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contributions of talker characteristics and spatial location to auditory streaming.
    Allen K; Carlile S; Alais D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1562-70. PubMed ID: 18345844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech perception engages a general timer: evidence from a divided attention word identification task.
    Casini L; Burle B; Nguyen N
    Cognition; 2009 Aug; 112(2):318-22. PubMed ID: 19457480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between listening to and shadowing a play for selective attention.
    Beech JR; McKeating RL
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Sep; 93(3):529-38. PubMed ID: 7212129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Within-ear and across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail party listening task: effects of masker uncertainty.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jan; 115(1):301-10. PubMed ID: 14759023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Message and talker identification in older adults: effects of task, distinctiveness of the talkers' voices, and meaningfulness of the competing message.
    Rossi-Katz J; Arehart KH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 52(2):435-53. PubMed ID: 19064902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory.
    Lim SJ; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1167-1177. PubMed ID: 30737757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.