312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18247760)
1. A computer model of medial efferent suppression in the mammalian auditory system.
Ferry RT; Meddis R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3519-26. PubMed ID: 18247760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: implications for the recognition of speech in noise.
Brown GJ; Ferry RT; Meddis R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):943-54. PubMed ID: 20136217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of centrifugal pathways on responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in noise.
Mulders WH; Seluakumaran K; Robertson D
Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 27(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 18279322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
Kawase T; Liberman MC
J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A model of perceptual segregation based on clustering the time series of the simulated auditory nerve firing probability.
Balaguer-Ballester E; Coath M; Denham SL
Biol Cybern; 2007 Dec; 97(5-6):479-91. PubMed ID: 17994247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Representation of the vowel /epsilon/ in normal and impaired auditory nerve fibers: model predictions of responses in cats.
Zilany MS; Bruce IC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):402-17. PubMed ID: 17614499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diverse responses of single auditory afferent fibres to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus in guinea-pig.
Mulders WH; Robertson D
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 15309356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating peripheral gain and compression using fixed-duration masking curves.
Yasin I; Drga V; Plack CJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4145-55. PubMed ID: 23742366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Latency, threshold and frequency selectivity of the crossed medial cochlear efferent pathways].
Bonfils P; Puel JL; Pujol R
C R Acad Sci III; 1987; 304(17):461-4. PubMed ID: 3109694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dopamine transporter is essential for the maintenance of spontaneous activity of auditory nerve neurones and their responsiveness to sound stimulation.
Ruel J; Wang J; Demêmes D; Gobaille S; Puel JL; Rebillard G
J Neurochem; 2006 Apr; 97(1):190-200. PubMed ID: 16524378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: distributions of the first-spike latencies of auditory-nerve fibers.
Heil P; Neubauer H; Brown M; Irvine DR
Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 238(1-2):25-38. PubMed ID: 18077116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A physiological model for the stimulus dependence of first-spike latency of auditory-nerve fibers.
Neubauer H; Heil P
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():208-23. PubMed ID: 17936252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Function of the olivocochlear system.
Pfalz KJ
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1973; 20():311-5. PubMed ID: 4710514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A frequency-selective feedback model of auditory efferent suppression and its implications for the recognition of speech in noise.
Clark NR; Brown GJ; Jürgens T; Meddis R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1535-41. PubMed ID: 22978882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of the efferent medial olivocochlear system in contralateral masking and binaural interactions: an electrophysiological study in guinea pigs.
Aran JM; Pajor AM; de Sauvage RC; Erre JP
Audiology; 2000; 39(6):311-21. PubMed ID: 11766691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting dynamic range and intensity discrimination for electrical pulse-train stimuli using a stochastic auditory nerve model: the effects of stimulus noise.
Xu Y; Collins LM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun; 52(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15977734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efferent tracts and cochlear frequency selectivity.
Bonfils P; Remond MC; Pujol R
Hear Res; 1986; 24(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 3793643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tuning properties of turtle auditory nerve fibers: evidence for suppression and adaptation.
Sneary MG; Lewis ER
Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):22-30. PubMed ID: 17331685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Conception of the function of the central auditory pathways].
Dunker E; Krämer B
HNO; 1972 Dec; 20(12):351-62. PubMed ID: 4347282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics.
Moore BC
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1986; 25():139-52. PubMed ID: 3472318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
