These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18247772)

  • 21. New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers.
    Wong LL; Vandali AE; Ciocca V; Luk B; Ip VW; Murray B; Yu HC; Chung I
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):337-47. PubMed ID: 18569106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners.
    Cooper HR; Roberts B
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):11-24. PubMed ID: 17257790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gap duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: effects of gap and marker duration, frequency separation, and mode of presentation.
    Grose JH; Hall JW; Buss E
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Dec; 2(4):388-98. PubMed ID: 11833611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of a temporal fundamental frequency coding strategy for cochlear implants.
    Vandali AE; van Hoesel RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):4023-36. PubMed ID: 21682423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of two frequency-to-electrode maps for acoustic-electric stimulation.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC; Sucher C; Briggs RJ
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Feb; 48(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 19219690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The perception of prosody and speaker gender in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Walger M; von Wedel H
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Jan; 48(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 19173112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cochlear implants: a perspective.
    Moores DF
    Am Ann Deaf; 2010; 154(5):415-6. PubMed ID: 20415274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Single-channel to multichannel conversions in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.
    Miyamoto RT; Osberger MJ; Cunningham L; Kirk KI; Myres WA; Robbins AM; Kessler K
    Am J Otol; 1994 Jan; 15(1):40-5; discussion 45-6. PubMed ID: 8109629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ear and contralateral masker effects on auditory temporal gap detection thresholds.
    Carmichael ME; Hall SE; Phillips DP
    Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):18-23. PubMed ID: 18761067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The acceptance of background noise in adult cochlear implant users.
    Plyler PN; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Apr; 51(2):502-15. PubMed ID: 18367692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modeling the effect of channel number and interaction on consonant recognition in a cochlear implant peak-picking strategy.
    Verschuur C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1723-36. PubMed ID: 19275329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Auditory stream segregation in cochlear implant listeners: measures based on temporal discrimination and interleaved melody recognition.
    Cooper HR; Roberts B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):1975-87. PubMed ID: 19813809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of cochlear implant electrode insertion on middle-ear function as measured by intra-operative laser Doppler vibrometry.
    Donnelly N; Bibas A; Jiang D; Bamiou DE; Santulli C; Jeronimidis G; Fitzgerald O'Connor A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Jul; 123(7):723-9. PubMed ID: 19138455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The gaps-in-noise test: gap detection thresholds in normal-hearing young adults.
    Samelli AG; Schochat E
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):238-45. PubMed ID: 18465408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of envelope fluctuations on gap detection.
    Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 64(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 1490904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.