These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18247772)

  • 41. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Random Gap Detection Test and Random Gap Detection Test-Expanded results in children with auditory neuropathy.
    Yalçinkaya F; Muluk NB; Ataş A; Keith RW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Nov; 73(11):1558-63. PubMed ID: 19735949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Combining temporal-envelope cues across channels: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Souza PE; Boike KT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 49(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 16533079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music.
    Limb CJ
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(5):337-40. PubMed ID: 16974148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover.
    Lenarz T; Stöver T; Buechner A; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Patrick J; Pesch J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():22-31. PubMed ID: 19390172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Broadband auditory stream segregation by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Valentine S; Lentz JJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1341-52. PubMed ID: 18664686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The development of temporal resolution: between-channel gap detection in infants and adults.
    Smith NA; Trainor LJ; Shore DI
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 49(5):1104-13. PubMed ID: 17077218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users.
    Sucher CM; McDermott HJ
    Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 230(1-2):80-7. PubMed ID: 17604582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Opinions on cochlear implant use in senior MED-EL patients.
    Anderson I; D'Haese PS; Pitterl M
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006; 68(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 16707916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects.
    Veekmans K; Ressel L; Mueller J; Vischer M; Brockmeier SJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(5):315-26. PubMed ID: 19372650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions.
    Emiroglu S; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():199-207. PubMed ID: 17991457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Natural boundaries in gap detection are related to categorical perception of stop consonants.
    Elangovan S; Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):761-74. PubMed ID: 18769272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users.
    Pretorius LL; Hanekom JJ
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Auditory streaming based on temporal structure in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stainsby TH; Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):119-30. PubMed ID: 15157970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Tissue resistivities determine the current flow in the cochlea.
    Micco AG; Richter CP
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 16974151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Monaural envelope correlation perception in listeners with normal hearing and cochlear impairment.
    Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 36(6):1306-14. PubMed ID: 8114497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of slow- and fast-acting compression on the detection of gaps in narrow bands of noise.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Alcántara JI; Launer S; Kuehnel V
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):365-74. PubMed ID: 11848178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Stimulus, task, and learning effects on measures of temporal resolution: implications for predictors of language outcome.
    Smith NA; Trainor LJ; Gray K; Plantinga JA; Shore DI
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Dec; 51(6):1630-42. PubMed ID: 18664697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.