These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18247775)

  • 41. Evaluation of two algorithms for detecting human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Lin CY; Lin CD; Wang CY; Chung HK; Li X
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21047294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception.
    Yu KM; Lam HW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1320. PubMed ID: 25190405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Phonetic tone signals phonological quantity and word structure.
    Vainio M; Järvikivi J; Aalto D; Suni A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1313-21. PubMed ID: 20815466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A relationship between processing speech in noise and dysarthric speech.
    Borrie SA; Baese-Berk M; Van Engen K; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4660. PubMed ID: 28679257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of lowpass and highpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine structure or envelope cues.
    Ardoint M; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):89-95. PubMed ID: 19963053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Acoustic markers of syllabic stress in Spanish excellent oesophageal speakers.
    Cuenca MH; Barrio MM; Anaya P; Establier C
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2012 Jan; 26(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 21728835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The use of fundamental frequency for lexical segmentation in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Spitzer S; Liss J; Spahr T; Dorman M; Lansford K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):EL236-41. PubMed ID: 19507928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effects of stress and statistical cues on continuous speech segmentation: an event-related brain potential study.
    Cunillera T; Toro JM; Sebastián-Gallés N; Rodríguez-Fornells A
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1123(1):168-78. PubMed ID: 17064672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Selective acoustic cues for French voiceless stop consonants.
    Bonneau A; Laprie Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4482-97. PubMed ID: 18537398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Speaking rate affects the perception of duration as a suprasegmental lexical-stress cue.
    Reinisch E; Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Lang Speech; 2011 Jun; 54(Pt 2):147-65. PubMed ID: 21848077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The perception of prosody and speaker gender in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Walger M; von Wedel H
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Jan; 48(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 19173112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
    van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Developmental trajectory for production of prosody: lexical stress contrastivity in children ages 3 to 7 years and in adults.
    Ballard KJ; Djaja D; Arciuli J; James DG; van Doorn J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1822-35. PubMed ID: 22473835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues.
    Gilbert G; Bergeras I; Voillery D; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1336. PubMed ID: 17927396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Coding pitch differences in voiceless fricatives: Whispered relative to normal speech.
    Heeren WF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3427-38. PubMed ID: 26723300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. On the robustness of overall F0-only modifications to the perception of emotions in speech.
    Bulut M; Narayanan S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4547-58. PubMed ID: 18537403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perception of the Lexical Accent Contrast in One Variety of East Norwegian.
    Kelly NE; Smiljanić R
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):339-357. PubMed ID: 28653551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Identification of frequency-shifted vowels.
    Assmann PF; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3203-12. PubMed ID: 19045804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of syntactic expectations on speech segmentation.
    Mattys SL; Melhorn JF; White L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):960-77. PubMed ID: 17683240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Discrimination of speech sounds based upon temporal envelope versus fine structure cues in 5- to 7-year-old children.
    Bertoncini J; Serniclaes W; Lorenzi C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):682-95. PubMed ID: 18952853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.