502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18247906)
1. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width.
Aronson L; Rosenhouse J; Podoshin L; Rosenhouse G; Zanutto SB
Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.
Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Place-pitch and vowel-pitch comparisons in cochlear implant patients using the Melbourne-Nucleus cochlear implant.
Pauka CK
J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989; 19():1-31. PubMed ID: 2693565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function.
Baumann U; Nobbe A
Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 16442249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two frequency-to-electrode maps for acoustic-electric stimulation.
Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC; Sucher C; Briggs RJ
Int J Audiol; 2009 Feb; 48(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 19219690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech discrimination via cochlear implants with two different digital speech processing strategies: preliminary results for 7 patients.
Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():145-53. PubMed ID: 8153560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
Kasturi K; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual fusion of polyphonic pitch in cochlear implant users.
Donnelly PJ; Guo BZ; Limb CJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):EL128-33. PubMed ID: 19894787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The University of Melbourne--nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant.
Clark GM; Blamey PJ; Brown AM; Gusby PA; Dowell RC; Franz BK; Pyman BC; Shepherd RK; Tong YC; Webb RL
Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1987; 38():V-IX, 1-181. PubMed ID: 3318305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of a pitch perception model to investigate the effect of stimulation field spread on the pitch ranking abilities of cochlear implant recipients.
Erfanian Saeedi N; Blamey PJ; Burkitt AN; Grayden DB
Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():129-37. PubMed ID: 25193552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.
Eddington DK; Dobelle WH; Brackmann DE; Mladejovsky MG; Parkin JL
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 736424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cochlear Implant Rate Pitch and Melody Perception as a Function of Place and Number of Electrodes.
Marimuthu V; Swanson BA; Mannell R
Trends Hear; 2016 Apr; 20():. PubMed ID: 27094028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.
Boyd PJ
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 21248642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
Niewiarowicz M; Stieler O
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005; 126(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16180345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
