BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18247919)

  • 1. Extended three-dimensional impedance map methods for identifying ultrasonic scattering sites.
    Mamou J; Oelze ML; O'Brien WD; Zachary JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1195-1208. PubMed ID: 18247919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of human fibroadenomas using three-dimensional impedance maps.
    Dapore AJ; King MR; Harter J; Sarwate S; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; Do MN; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Jun; 30(6):1206-13. PubMed ID: 21278015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identifying ultrasonic scattering sites from three-dimensional impedance maps.
    Mamou J; Oelze ML; O'Brien WD; Zachary JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jan; 117(1):413-23. PubMed ID: 15704434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using two-dimensional impedance maps to study weak scattering in sparse random media.
    Luchies AC; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1557. PubMed ID: 27106304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of tissue microstructure using ultrasonic backscatter: theory and technique for optimization using a Gaussian form factor.
    Oelze ML; Zachary JF; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1202-11. PubMed ID: 12243165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional impedance map analysis of rabbit liver.
    Pawlicki AD; Dapore AJ; Sarwate S; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL334-8. PubMed ID: 22088037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of the container on structure function with impedance map analysis of dense scattering media.
    Luchies AC; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2172. PubMed ID: 29716277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differentiation and characterization of rat mammary fibroadenomas and 4T1 mouse carcinomas using quantitative ultrasound imaging.
    Oelze ML; O'Brien WD; Blue JP; Zachary JF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jun; 23(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 15191150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved diagnostics through quantitative ultrasound imaging.
    Hruska DP; Sanchez J; Oelze ML
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():1956-9. PubMed ID: 19964021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantifying scattering from dense media using two-dimensional impedance maps.
    Tamura K; Mamou J; Yoshida K; Yamaguchi T; Franceschini E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep; 148(3):1681. PubMed ID: 33003867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effective scatterer diameter estimates for broad scatterer size distributions.
    Nordberg EP; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Jan; 37(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 24831300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of three scattering models to characterization of solid tumors in mice.
    Oelze ML; O'Brien WD
    Ultrason Imaging; 2006 Apr; 28(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 17094689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of intact tissues via delipidation and ultrasound.
    Li Y; Li N; Yu X; Huang K; Zheng T; Cheng X; Zeng S; Liu X
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12259. PubMed ID: 30115962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scatterer size estimation in pulse-echo ultrasound using focused sources: calibration measurements and phantom experiments.
    Bigelow TA; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):594-602. PubMed ID: 15296019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of the acoustic impedance of lung versus level of inflation for different species and ages of animals.
    Oelze ML; Miller RJ; Blue JP; Zachary JF; O'Brien WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2340-52. PubMed ID: 19062872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Viscoelastic properties of rodent mammary tumors using ultrasonic shear-wave imaging.
    Wang Y; Insana MF
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):126-45. PubMed ID: 23493612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parametric imaging of rat mammary tumors in vivo for the purposes of tissue characterization.
    Oelze ML; Zachary JF; O'Brien WD
    J Ultrasound Med; 2002 Nov; 21(11):1201-10. PubMed ID: 12418761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative assessment of in vivo breast masses using ultrasound attenuation and backscatter.
    Nam K; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Apr; 35(2):146-61. PubMed ID: 23493613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of microstructural alterations of normal and pathological breast tissue in vivo using the AR cepstrum.
    Bige Y; Hanfeng Z; Rong W
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Feb; 44(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 16387338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional high-frequency backscatter and envelope quantification of cancerous human lymph nodes.
    Mamou J; Coron A; Oelze ML; Saegusa-Beecroft E; Hata M; Lee P; Machi J; Yanagihara E; Laugier P; Feleppa EJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 37(3):345-57. PubMed ID: 21316559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.