BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18248057)

  • 1. Sparsity enhancement for blind deconvolution of ultrasonic signals in nondestructive testing application.
    Wei L; Hua-ming L; Pei-wen Q
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Jan; 79(1):014901. PubMed ID: 18248057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semi-sparse deconvolution robust to uncertainties in the impulse responses.
    Olofsson T
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):969-75. PubMed ID: 15047415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-dimensional blind Bayesian deconvolution of medical ultrasound images.
    Jirík R; Taxt T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2140-53. PubMed ID: 18986863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signal-to-noise ratio enhancement based on wavelet filtering in ultrasonic testing.
    Matz V; Smid R; Starman S; Kreidl M
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Dec; 49(8):752-9. PubMed ID: 19570560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-resolution ultrasonic imaging using fast two-dimensional homomorphic filtering.
    Jirík R; Taxt T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1440-8. PubMed ID: 16921896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reversible back-propagation imaging algorithm for postprocessing of ultrasonic array data.
    Velichko A; Wilcox PD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Nov; 56(11):2492-503. PubMed ID: 19942535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The wavenumber algorithm for full-matrix imaging using an ultrasonic array.
    Hunter AJ; Drinkwater BW; Wilcox PD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Nov; 55(11):2450-62. PubMed ID: 19049924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A proximal iteration for deconvolving Poisson noisy images using sparse representations.
    Dupé FX; Fadili JM; Starck JL
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Feb; 18(2):310-21. PubMed ID: 19131301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical implementation of matching pursuit for the analysis of complex ultrasonic signals.
    Lu Y; Michaels JE
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jan; 55(1):173-82. PubMed ID: 18334323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity to point-spread function parameters in medical ultrasound image deconvolution.
    Shin HC; Prager R; Ng J; Gomersall H; Kingsbury N; Treece G; Gee A
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Mar; 49(3):344-57. PubMed ID: 19068260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inverse wave field extrapolation: a different NDI approach to imaging defects.
    Pörtzgen N; Gisolf D; Blacquière G
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Jan; 54(1):118-27. PubMed ID: 17225806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Air-coupled ultrasonic spectroscopy of highly damping materials using pulse compression.
    Pallav P; Hutchins DA; Yin X
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Jun; 56(6):1207-17. PubMed ID: 19574128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wave equation-based imaging of mode converted waves in ultrasonic NDI, with suppressed leakage from nonmode converted waves.
    Portzgen N; Gisolf D; Verschuur DJ
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Aug; 55(8):1768-80. PubMed ID: 18986920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency-Wavelet Domain Deconvolution for terahertz reflection imaging and spectroscopy.
    Chen Y; Huang S; Pickwell-MacPherson E
    Opt Express; 2010 Jan; 18(2):1177-90. PubMed ID: 20173941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of sparse basis selection on ultrasonic signal representation.
    Zhang GM; Harvey DM; Braden DR
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 45(1-4):82-91. PubMed ID: 16930664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sparsity constrained deconvolution approaches for acoustic source mapping.
    Yardibi T; Li J; Stoica P; Cattafesta LN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2631-42. PubMed ID: 18529183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A restoration framework for ultrasonic tissue characterization.
    Alessandrini M; Maggio S; Porée J; De Marchi L; Speciale N; Franceschini E; Bernard O; Basset O
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Nov; 58(11):2344-60. PubMed ID: 22083768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variational bayesian blind deconvolution using a total variation prior.
    Babacan SD; Molina R; Katsaggelos AK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Jan; 18(1):12-26. PubMed ID: 19095515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microscopy image resolution improvement by deconvolution of complex fields.
    Cotte Y; Toy MF; Pavillon N; Depeursinge C
    Opt Express; 2010 Sep; 18(19):19462-78. PubMed ID: 20940842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonic flaw detection using threshold modified S-transform.
    Benammar A; Drai R; Guessoum A
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):676-83. PubMed ID: 24120270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.