418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18248114)
1. Task constraints mask great apes' ability to solve the trap-table task.
Girndt A; Meier T; Call J
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 18248114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How great apes perform on a modified trap-tube task.
Mulcahy NJ; Call J
Anim Cogn; 2006 Jul; 9(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 16612632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tubes, tables and traps: great apes solve two functionally equivalent trap tasks but show no evidence of transfer across tasks.
Martin-Ordas G; Call J; Colmenares F
Anim Cogn; 2008 Jul; 11(3):423-30. PubMed ID: 18183433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tracking the displacement of objects: a series of tasks with great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus) and young children (Homo sapiens).
Barth J; Call J
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jul; 32(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 16834492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed reward contingency task II: transfer to new quantities, long-term retention, and the impact of quantity ratios.
Uher J; Call J
J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 18489236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Piagetian liquid conservation in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, and Pongo pygmaeus).
Suda C; Call J
J Comp Psychol; 2004 Sep; 118(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 15482054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How the great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Gorilla gorilla) perform on the reversed contingency task: the effects of food quantity and food visibility.
Vlamings PH; Uher J; Call J
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jan; 32(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 16435965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Apes' use of iconic cues in the object-choice task.
Herrmann E; Melis AP; Tomasello M
Anim Cogn; 2006 Apr; 9(2):118-30. PubMed ID: 16395566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gravity and solidity in four great ape species (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus): vertical and horizontal variations of the table task.
Cacchione T; Call J; Zingg R
J Comp Psychol; 2009 May; 123(2):168-80. PubMed ID: 19450024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inferences about the location of food in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, and Pongo pygmaeus).
Call J
J Comp Psychol; 2004 Jun; 118(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 15250810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Piagetian conservation of discrete quantities in bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus).
Suda C; Call J
Anim Cogn; 2005 Oct; 8(4):220-35. PubMed ID: 15692813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, P. troglodytes, Pongo abelii) versus corvids (Corvus corax, C. corone) in a support task: the effect of pattern and functionality.
Albiach-Serrano A; Bugnyar T; Call J
J Comp Psychol; 2012 Nov; 126(4):355-67. PubMed ID: 22545765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Great apes select tools on the basis of their rigidity.
Manrique HM; Gross AN; Call J
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):409-22. PubMed ID: 20718558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The performance of bonobos (Pan paniscus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) in two versions of an object-choice task.
Mulcahy NJ; Call J
J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 19685972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Token transfers among great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus, Pan paniscus, and Pan troglodytes): species differences, gestural requests, and reciprocal exchange.
Pelé M; Dufour V; Thierry B; Call J
J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):375-84. PubMed ID: 19929106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Great apes' (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus) understanding of tool functional properties after limited experience.
Herrmann E; Wobber V; Call J
J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):220-30. PubMed ID: 18489238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Great apes' capacities to recognize relational similarity.
Haun DB; Call J
Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):147-59. PubMed ID: 19111286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inferences by exclusion in the great apes: the effect of age and species.
Call J
Anim Cogn; 2006 Oct; 9(4):393-403. PubMed ID: 16924458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrete quantity judgments in the great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus): the effect of presenting whole sets versus item-by-item.
Hanus D; Call J
J Comp Psychol; 2007 Aug; 121(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 17696650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Great apes use weight as a cue to find hidden food.
Schrauf C; Call J
Am J Primatol; 2011 Apr; 73(4):323-34. PubMed ID: 21328591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
