These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18248121)

  • 1. Comparing patterning and biconditional discriminations in humans.
    Harris JA; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Jan; 34(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 18248121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative patterning is easier than a biconditional discrimination.
    Harris JA; Livesey EJ; Gharaei S; Westbrook RF
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Oct; 34(4):494-500. PubMed ID: 18954233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Elemental, configural, and occasion setting mechanisms in biconditional and patterning discriminations.
    Delamater AR; Garr E; Lawrence S; Whitlow JW
    Behav Processes; 2017 Apr; 137():40-52. PubMed ID: 27826037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When patterning discriminations are harder than biconditional ones: A cue constellation approach.
    Whitlow JW; Loatman PA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 26147603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elemental representations of stimuli in associative learning.
    Harris JA
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jul; 113(3):584-605. PubMed ID: 16802882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Negative patterning and biconditional discriminations in human causal reasoning: a second look.
    Whitlow JW
    Am J Psychol; 2013; 126(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 23505955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Convergent results in eyeblink conditioning and contingency learning in humans: addition of a common cue does not affect feature-negative discriminations.
    Thorwart A; Glautier S; Lachnit H
    Biol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 85(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 20638441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing learned predictiveness effects within and across compound discriminations.
    Livesey EJ; Thorwart A; De Fina NL; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):446-65. PubMed ID: 21517197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Summation in causal learning: elemental processing or configural generalization?
    Collins DJ; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1524-34. PubMed ID: 16873106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positive and negative patterning in human causal learning.
    Young ME; Wasserman EA; Johnson JL; Jones FL
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 10881604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flexible Configural Learning of Non-Linear Discriminations and Detection of Stimulus Compounds.
    Glautier S; Menneer T; Godwin HJ; Donnelly N; Aristizabal JA
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Jul; 63(4):215-236. PubMed ID: 27750517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing positive and negative patterning in human learning.
    Livesey EJ; Thorwart A; Harris JA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Dec; 64(12):2316-33. PubMed ID: 22026453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of pretraining on acquisition of novel configural discriminations in human predictive learning.
    Mehta R; Russell E
    Learn Behav; 2009 Nov; 37(4):311-24. PubMed ID: 19815928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cue competition influences biconditional discrimination.
    Byrom NC; Murphy RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):182-192. PubMed ID: 28764580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluid Abilities and Rule Learning: Patterning and Biconditional Discriminations.
    Baetu I; Burns NR; Yu E; Baker AG
    J Intell; 2018 Feb; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 31162434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus-outcome interactions during instrumental discrimination learning by rats and humans.
    de Wit S; Niry D; Wariyar R; Aitken MR; Dickinson A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Jan; 33(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17227190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing elemental and configural associative theories in human causal learning: a case for attention.
    Lachnit H; Schultheis H; König S; Ungör M; Melchers K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2008 Apr; 34(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 18426312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the unique cue in configural discriminations.
    Rescorla RA; Grau JW; Durlach PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Jul; 11(3):356-66. PubMed ID: 4009124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elemental and non-elemental olfactory learning in Drosophila.
    Young JM; Wessnitzer J; Armstrong JD; Webb B
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2011 Sep; 96(2):339-52. PubMed ID: 21742045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transfer of associability and relational structure in human associative learning.
    Livesey EJ; Don HJ; Uengoer M; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):125-142. PubMed ID: 30816735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.