These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18248132)

  • 1. A case for inhibition: visual attention suppresses the processing of irrelevant objects.
    Wühr P; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):116-30. PubMed ID: 18248132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Stroop effect for spatial orientation.
    Wühr P
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Jul; 134(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 17824399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inhibition is picky: shape difference is a necessary condition for attentional inhibition of irrelevant objects.
    Wühr P; Frings C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):839-44. PubMed ID: 19815786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossmodal object-based attention: auditory objects affect visual processing.
    Turatto M; Mazza V; Umiltà C
    Cognition; 2005 Jun; 96(2):B55-64. PubMed ID: 15925569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Object discrimination by pigeons: effects of object color and shape.
    Lazareva OF; Vecera SP; Levin J; Wasserman EA
    Behav Processes; 2005 Apr; 69(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 15795067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The path of visual attention.
    Brown JM; Breitmeyer BG; Leighty KA; Denney HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 16321354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The active inhibition for the processing of visual irrelevant conflict information.
    Mao W; Wang Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Jan; 67(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 17999937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional spreading in object-based attention.
    Richard AM; Lee H; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 18665730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Don't be afraid of irrelevant words: the emotional Stroop effect is confined to attended words.
    Frings C; Wühr P
    Cogn Emot; 2012; 26(6):1056-68. PubMed ID: 22404379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When does visual attention select all features of a distractor?
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1452-64. PubMed ID: 17154784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of unattended features on object processing depends on task demand.
    Mayer KM; Vuong QC
    Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 56():20-7. PubMed ID: 22306678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.
    Algom D; Chajut E; Lev S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15355142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.
    Schmidt JR; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 18444752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition or facilitation of return: Does chromatic component count?
    do Canto-Pereira LH; Paramei GV; Morya E; Ranvaud RD
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):489-93. PubMed ID: 16961985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonconscious control mimics a purposeful strategy: strength of Stroop-like interference is automatically modulated by proportion of compatible trials.
    Klapp ST
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1366-76. PubMed ID: 18085949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induced gamma-band activity elicited by visual representation of unattended objects.
    Martinovic J; Gruber T; Ohla K; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 18476754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Object-based attention and visual area LO.
    de-Wit LH; Kentridge RW; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1483-90. PubMed ID: 19038274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
    He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S
    Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: a combined behavioral and psychophysiological study.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Dec; 132(4):512-29. PubMed ID: 14640845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.