These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18248136)

  • 1. Direct-comparison judgments: when and why above- and below-average effects reverse.
    Windschitl PD; Conybeare D; Krizan Z
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):182-200. PubMed ID: 18248136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biases in social comparative judgments: the role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects.
    Chambers JR; Windschitl PD
    Psychol Bull; 2004 Sep; 130(5):813-38. PubMed ID: 15367082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why the parts are better (or worse) than the whole: the unique-attributes hypothesis.
    Chambers JR
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):268-75. PubMed ID: 20424056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Judgments about judgments: the dissociation of consideration price and transaction commitment judgments.
    Janiszewski C; Lichtenstein DR; Belyavsky J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):151-64. PubMed ID: 18590371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biased decision-making: developing an understanding of how positive and negative relationships may skew judgments.
    Mills CM; Grant MG
    Dev Sci; 2009 Sep; 12(5):784-97. PubMed ID: 19702770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of target group size on risk judgments and comparative optimism: the more, the riskier.
    Price PC; Smith AR; Lench HC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Mar; 90(3):382-98. PubMed ID: 16594826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Value-induced bias in medical decision making.
    Levy AG; Hershey JC
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 18349431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment.
    Pronin E
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Jan; 11(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17129749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Error and bias in comparative judgment: on being both better and worse than we think we are.
    Moore DA; Small DA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Jun; 92(6):972-89. PubMed ID: 17547483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: a research review.
    Feigenson N; Park J
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):143-61. PubMed ID: 16786404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are people excessive or judicious in their egocentrism? A modeling approach to understanding bias and accuracy in people's optimism.
    Windschitl PD; Rose JP; Stalkfleet MT; Smith AR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Aug; 95(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 18665701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability.
    Dougherty MR; Sprenger A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 16719653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative judgments as an alternative to ratings: identifying the scale origin.
    Böckenholt U
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Dec; 9(4):453-65. PubMed ID: 15598099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Univariate and default standard unit biases in estimation of body weight and caloric content.
    Geier AB; Rozin P
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Jun; 15(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19586254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of the human pulvinar in visual attention and action: evidence from temporal-order judgment, saccade decision, and antisaccade tasks.
    Arend I; Machado L; Ward R; McGrath M; Ro T; Rafal RD
    Prog Brain Res; 2008; 171():475-83. PubMed ID: 18718343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the relativity of athletic performance: a comparison perspective on performance judgments in sports.
    Damisch L; Mussweiler T
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 174():13-24. PubMed ID: 19477326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: effects of perceptual fluency on categorization.
    Oppenheimer DM; Frank MC
    Cognition; 2008 Mar; 106(3):1178-94. PubMed ID: 17618616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Casuistry and social category bias.
    Norton MI; Vandello JA; Darley JM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Dec; 87(6):817-31. PubMed ID: 15598108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size bias in judgments of perceptual averages.
    Price PC; Kimura NM; Smith AR; Marshall LD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1321-31. PubMed ID: 24749965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reference-frame misalignment and cardinal direction judgments: group differences and strategies.
    Gugerty L; Brooks J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2004 Jun; 10(2):75-88. PubMed ID: 15222802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.