These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18248136)

  • 21. The ultimate sampling dilemma in experience-based decision making.
    Fiedler K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):186-203. PubMed ID: 18194062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reversed better-than-average effect in direct comparisons of nonsocial stimuli depends on the set size.
    Niewiarowski J; Karyłowski JJ; Szutkiewicz-Szekalska K; Cypryańska M
    Mem Cognit; 2014 May; 42(4):639-47. PubMed ID: 24352697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Two ways to be complex and why they matter: implications for attitude strength and lying.
    Conway LG; Thoemmes F; Allison AM; Towgood KH; Wagner MJ; Davey K; Salcido A; Stovall AN; Dodds DP; Bongard K; Conway KR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Nov; 95(5):1029-44. PubMed ID: 18954192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment.
    Sloman S; Rottenstreich Y; Wisniewski E; Hadjichristidis C; Fox CR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 15099126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cognitive science and the law.
    Busey TA; Loftus GR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):111-7. PubMed ID: 17270486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of accuracy and bias in genetic evaluations with genetic groups using sampling.
    Hickey JM; Keane MG; Kenny DA; Cromie AR; Mulder HA; Veerkamp RF
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1047-56. PubMed ID: 18272854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry, complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization.
    Tinio PP; Leder H
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Mar; 130(3):241-50. PubMed ID: 19217589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The morality of harm.
    Sousa P; Holbrook C; Piazza J
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 19717146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Familiarity Bias and Belief Reversal in Relative Likelihood Judgment.
    Fox CR; Levav J
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Jul; 82(2):268-292. PubMed ID: 10891298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Balancing emotion and cognition: a case for decision aiding in conservation efforts.
    Wilson RS
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1452-60. PubMed ID: 18717697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight bias effect.
    Ash IK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):916-33. PubMed ID: 19586261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Strategies for revising judgment: how (and how well) people use others' opinions.
    Soll JB; Larrick RP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):780-805. PubMed ID: 19379049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cue-interaction effects in contingency judgments using the streamed-trial procedure.
    Hannah SD; Crump MJ; Allan LG; Siegel S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Jun; 63(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 19485601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Provider judgments of patients in pain: seeking symptom certainty.
    Tait RC; Chibnall JT; Kalauokalani D
    Pain Med; 2009 Jan; 10(1):11-34. PubMed ID: 18992039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Overconfidence: It Depends on How, What, and Whom You Ask.
    Klayman J; Soll JB; González-Vallejo C; Barlas S
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Sep; 79(3):216-247. PubMed ID: 10471362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of global versus local processing styles on assimilation versus contrast in social judgment.
    Förster J; Liberman N; Kuschel S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):579-99. PubMed ID: 18361673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automatic optimism: the affective basis of judgments about the likelihood of future events.
    Lench HC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 19397379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anchoring on the "here" and "now" in time and distance judgments.
    LeBoeuf RA; Shafir E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):81-93. PubMed ID: 19210082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spurious consensus and opinion revision: why might people be more confident in their less accurate judgments?
    Yaniv I; Choshen-Hillel S; Milyavsky M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):558-63. PubMed ID: 19271867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.