BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18248152)

  • 21. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
    Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of word length and other sublexical, lexical, and semantic variables on developmental reading deficits.
    De Luca M; Barca L; Burani C; Zoccolotti P
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Dec; 21(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 19057172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reading aloud: evidence for contextual control over lexical activation.
    Ferguson R; Robidoux S; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):499-507. PubMed ID: 19331503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Semantic processing of previews within compound words.
    White SJ; Bertram R; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jul; 34(4):988-93. PubMed ID: 18605883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Word integration and regression programming during reading: a test of the E-Z reader 10 model.
    Inhoff AW; Greenberg SN; Solomon M; Wang CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1571-84. PubMed ID: 19803657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The spatial coding model of visual word identification.
    Davis CJ
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):713-58. PubMed ID: 20658851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reading polymorphemic Dutch compounds: toward a multiple route model of lexical processing.
    Kuperman V; Schreuder R; Bertram R; Baayen RH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):876-95. PubMed ID: 19485697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reading aloud: does previous trial history modulate the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency?
    O'Malley S; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1321-5. PubMed ID: 23855551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Syllables and bigrams: orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels.
    Conrad M; Carreiras M; Tamm S; Jacobs AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):461-79. PubMed ID: 19331501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Age of acquisition, not word frequency affects object recognition: evidence from the effects of visual degradation.
    Catling JC; Dent K; Williamson S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 18599003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of context in the word recognition process by adults with a significant history of reading difficulties.
    Corkett JK; Parrila R
    Ann Dyslexia; 2008 Dec; 58(2):139-61. PubMed ID: 18825501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The left fusiform area is affected by written frequency of words.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Adorni R
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2292-9. PubMed ID: 18485421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modeling the effects of choice-set size on the processing of letters and words.
    Rouder JN
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 14756587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing.
    Estes Z; Jones LL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 19203172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does degree of asymmetry relate to performance? An investigation of word recognition and reading in consistent and mixed handers.
    Chiarello C; Welcome SE; Halderman LK; Leonard CM
    Brain Cogn; 2009 Apr; 69(3):521-30. PubMed ID: 19100673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The rank hypothesis and lexical decision: a reply to Adelman and Brown (2008).
    Murray WS; Forster KI
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):240-52. PubMed ID: 18211198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Speculation about behavior, brain damage, and self-organization: the other way to herd a cat.
    Colangelo A; Holden JG; Buchanan L; Van Orden GC
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):151-9. PubMed ID: 15172533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Testing the multiple in the multiple read-out model of visual word recognition.
    De Moor W; Verguts T; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1502-8. PubMed ID: 16393060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.