These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18248669)

  • 1. Correction of technical bias in clinical microarray data improves concordance with known biological information.
    Eklund AC; Szallasi Z
    Genome Biol; 2008; 9(2):R26. PubMed ID: 18248669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multiclass classification of microarray data with repeated measurements: application to cancer.
    Yeung KY; Bumgarner RE
    Genome Biol; 2003; 4(12):R83. PubMed ID: 14659020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of experimental noise and annotation imprecision on data quality in microarray experiments.
    Scherer A; Dai M; Meng F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 972():155-76. PubMed ID: 23385537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducible and reliable microarray results through quality control: good laboratory proficiency and appropriate data analysis practices are essential.
    Shi L; Perkins RG; Fang H; Tong W
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 19(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 18155896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lack of correct data format and comparability limits future integrative microarray research.
    Larsson O; Sandberg R
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1322-3. PubMed ID: 17093466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms.
    Tan PK; Downey TJ; Spitznagel EL; Xu P; Fu D; Dimitrov DS; Lempicki RA; Raaka BM; Cam MC
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2003 Oct; 31(19):5676-84. PubMed ID: 14500831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rank Difference Analysis of Microarrays (RDAM), a novel approach to statistical analysis of microarray expression profiling data.
    Martin DE; Demougin P; Hall MN; Bellis M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Oct; 5():148. PubMed ID: 15476558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tilescope: online analysis pipeline for high-density tiling microarray data.
    Zhang ZD; Rozowsky J; Lam HY; Du J; Snyder M; Gerstein M
    Genome Biol; 2007; 8(5):R81. PubMed ID: 17501994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical implementation of the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer.
    Perou CM; Parker JS; Prat A; Ellis MJ; Bernard PS
    Lancet Oncol; 2010 Aug; 11(8):718-9; author reply 720-1. PubMed ID: 20688274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gene set internal coherence in the context of functional profiling.
    Montaner D; Minguez P; Al-Shahrour F; Dopazo J
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Apr; 10():197. PubMed ID: 19397819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standards in gene expression microarray experiments.
    Salit M
    Methods Enzymol; 2006; 411():63-78. PubMed ID: 16939786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-platform comparison of SYBR Green real-time PCR with TaqMan PCR, microarrays and other gene expression measurement technologies evaluated in the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) study.
    Arikawa E; Sun Y; Wang J; Zhou Q; Ning B; Dial SL; Guo L; Yang J
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Jul; 9():328. PubMed ID: 18620571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of microarray data: a further analysis of microarray quality control (MAQC) data.
    Chen JJ; Hsueh HM; Delongchamp RR; Lin CJ; Tsai CA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Oct; 8():412. PubMed ID: 17961233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurate and reproducible gene expression profiles from laser capture microdissection, transcript amplification, and high density oligonucleotide microarray analysis.
    Luzzi V; Mahadevappa M; Raja R; Warrington JA; Watson MA
    J Mol Diagn; 2003 Feb; 5(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 12552074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The need for standards, not guidelines, in biological data reporting and sharing.
    Burgoon LD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1369-73. PubMed ID: 17093486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The statistical challenge of false positives with microarrays].
    Michiels S; Hill C
    Med Sci (Paris); 2008 Mar; 24(3):317-9. PubMed ID: 18334183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dye bias correction in dual-labeled cDNA microarray gene expression measurements.
    Rosenzweig BA; Pine PS; Domon OE; Morris SM; Chen JJ; Sistare FD
    Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Mar; 112(4):480-7. PubMed ID: 15033598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential analysis of DNA microarray gene expression data.
    Hatfield GW; Hung SP; Baldi P
    Mol Microbiol; 2003 Feb; 47(4):871-7. PubMed ID: 12581345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and reproducibility of gene expression measurements using amplified RNA from laser-microdissected primary breast tissue with oligonucleotide arrays.
    King C; Guo N; Frampton GM; Gerry NP; Lenburg ME; Rosenberg CL
    J Mol Diagn; 2005 Feb; 7(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 15681475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA microarrays: vital statistics.
    Tilstone C
    Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):610-2. PubMed ID: 12904757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.