421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18248916)
21. Plus ça change.
Nat Med; 2004 Dec; 10(12):1263. PubMed ID: 15580230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Science in the White House.
Holdren JP
Science; 2009 May; 324(5927):567. PubMed ID: 19407163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [The scientific and technological policy depicted in the annual addresses of heads of state].
Szmercsányi T
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos; 2000 Nov-2001 Feb; 7(3):715-26. PubMed ID: 16683343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Science policy. Group raises hackles as well as funds.
Lawler A
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5536):1747-9. PubMed ID: 11546847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Science, precaution, and the politics of technological risk: converging implications in evolutionary and social scientific perspectives.
Stirling A
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Apr; 1128():95-110. PubMed ID: 18469218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Concern is more than just 'ruffled feathers'.
Chan KM; Porder S; Higgins PA; Kramer SB
Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Putting science to work in developing a climate policy.
Cicerone RJ
ChemSusChem; 2009; 2(5):393-4. PubMed ID: 19418502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Government must do more to de-politicise science, says US group.
McKie R
BMJ; 2012 Feb; 344():e1392. PubMed ID: 22368288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Gender issues in US science and technology policy: equality of what?
Cozzens SE
Sci Eng Ethics; 2008 Sep; 14(3):345-56. PubMed ID: 18481198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Renewing governance.
Loos GP
New Solut; 2003; 13(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 17208717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Policy decision-making under scientific uncertainty: radiological risk assessment and the role of expert advisory groups.
Mossman KL
Health Phys; 2009 Aug; 97(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 19590269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What influences the transfer of research into health policy and practice? Observations from England and Australia.
Nutbeam D; Boxall AM
Public Health; 2008 Aug; 122(8):747-53. PubMed ID: 18561966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. U.S. science policy. Marburger shakes up White House office.
Lawler A
Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5544):973-4. PubMed ID: 11691959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Prevention of false scientific speech: a new role for an evidence-based approach.
Guzelian C; Guzelian P
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Oct; 27(10):733-6. PubMed ID: 19042956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The facts of evolution: fighting the Endarkenment.
Weissmann G
FASEB J; 2005 Oct; 19(12):1581-2. PubMed ID: 16195364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Budget instructions.
Goldston D
Nature; 2009 Sep; 461(7260):25. PubMed ID: 19727178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. U.S. science policy. Memo to Congress: get better advice.
Malakoff D
Science; 2001 Jun; 292(5525):2229-30. PubMed ID: 11423626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Challenges of linking scientific knowledge to river basin management policy: AquaTerra as a case study.
Slob AF; Rijnveld M; Chapman AS; Strosser P
Environ Pollut; 2007 Aug; 148(3):867-74. PubMed ID: 17481787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Policy making and roles of health technology assessment.
Tantivess S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S88-99. PubMed ID: 19253491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Helping the president.
Lane N
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5924):147. PubMed ID: 19359547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
