These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18249280)

  • 21. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age.
    Dimaggio FR; Ciusa V; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 17920500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
    Akhare PJ; Daga A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Facial esthetics--presentation of an ideal face.
    Jefferson Y
    J Gen Orthod; 1993 Mar; 4(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 8399723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of dental and background facial attractiveness on facial attractiveness and perceived integrity and social and intellectual qualities.
    Papio MA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):464-474.e1. PubMed ID: 31582118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of panel composition on aesthetic evaluation of adolescent faces.
    Kiekens RM; van 't Hof MA; Straatman H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Maltha JC
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 17290021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Role of Ideal Angles, Ratios, and Divine Proportions in Aesthetic Evaluation of Adolescents.
    Malkoc S; Fidancioglu A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Feb; 40(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 26510875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.
    Baker RS; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):523-533. PubMed ID: 29602344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of dental esthetics on social perceptions of adolescents judged by peers.
    Henson ST; Lindauer SJ; Gardner WG; Shroff B; Tufekci E; Best AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 21889084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ideal proportions in full face front view, contemporary versus antique.
    Mommaerts MY; Moerenhout BA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 39(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 20542444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Laypersons' perceptions of the esthetics of visible anterior occlusion.
    Flores-Mir C; Silva E; Barriga MI; Valverde RH; Lagravère MO; Major PW
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Dec; 71(11):849. PubMed ID: 16480599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of malocclusions on facial attractiveness and their correlations with the divine proportion.
    Akan S; Torgut AG; Oktay H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):427-436. PubMed ID: 28451737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Angular asymmetries of the human face.
    Namano S; Behrend DA; Harcourt JK; Wilson PR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11203607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness.
    Tulloch C; Phillips C; Dann C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 8301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.