These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18250982)

  • 1. PET kinetic analysis: error consideration of quantitative analysis in dynamic studies.
    Ikoma Y; Watabe H; Shidahara M; Naganawa M; Kimura Y
    Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jan; 22(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18250982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhanced parameter estimation methods for noisy SPECT data.
    Wen L; Eberl S; Choi HC; Feng DD; Fulham M
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Feb; 89(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 17502121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PET kinetic analysis: wavelet denoising of dynamic PET data with application to parametric imaging.
    Shidahara M; Ikoma Y; Kershaw J; Kimura Y; Naganawa M; Watabe H
    Ann Nucl Med; 2007 Sep; 21(7):379-86. PubMed ID: 17876550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of the injected activity in dynamic 3D PET: a generalized approach using patient-specific NECs as demonstrated by a series of 15O-H2O scans.
    Walker MD; Matthews JC; Asselin MC; Saleem A; Dickinson C; Charnley N; Julyan PJ; Price PM; Jones T
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Sep; 50(9):1409-17. PubMed ID: 19690021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of biokinetic models for radiopharmaceuticals used in nuclear medicine.
    Li WB; Hoeschen C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):228-31. PubMed ID: 20185457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Joint estimation of dynamic PET images and temporal basis functions using fully 4D ML-EM.
    Reader AJ; Sureau FC; Comtat C; Trébossen R; Buvat I
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5455-74. PubMed ID: 17047263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simplifications in analyzing positron emission tomography data: effects on outcome measures.
    Logan J; Alexoff D; Kriplani A
    Nucl Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 34(7):743-56. PubMed ID: 17921027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of image-space resolution modeling for studies with the high-resolution research tomograph.
    Sureau FC; Reader AJ; Comtat C; Leroy C; Ribeiro MJ; Buvat I; Trébossen R
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 49(6):1000-8. PubMed ID: 18511844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Error-corrected estimation of regional kinetic parameter histograms directly from pet projections.
    Pölönen H; Niemi J; Ruotsalainen U
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Dec; 55(24):7573-86. PubMed ID: 21098924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization algorithms and weighting factors for analysis of dynamic PET studies.
    Yaqub M; Boellaard R; Kropholler MA; Lammertsma AA
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(17):4217-32. PubMed ID: 16912378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical Poissonian-Gaussian noise modeling and fitting for single-image raw-data.
    Foi A; Trimeche M; Katkovnik V; Egiazarian K
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Oct; 17(10):1737-54. PubMed ID: 18784024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motion correction of PET brain images through deconvolution: II. Practical implementation and algorithm optimization.
    Raghunath N; Faber TL; Suryanarayanan S; Votaw JR
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):813-29. PubMed ID: 19131667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motion correction of PET brain images through deconvolution: I. Theoretical development and analysis in software simulations.
    Faber TL; Raghunath N; Tudorascu D; Votaw JR
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):797-811. PubMed ID: 19131672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum a posteriori estimation of diffusion tensor parameters using a Rician noise model: why, how and but.
    Andersson JL
    Neuroimage; 2008 Oct; 42(4):1340-56. PubMed ID: 18602480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noise and signal estimation in magnitude MRI and Rician distributed images: a LMMSE approach.
    Aja-Fernandez S; Alberola-Lopez C; Westin CF
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Aug; 17(8):1383-98. PubMed ID: 18632347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability estimation for statistical shape models.
    Sukno FM; Frangi AF
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Dec; 17(12):2442-55. PubMed ID: 19004714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tracer kinetics analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR data in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: comparison of the results.
    Bisdas S; Baghi M; Wagenblast J; Bisdas T; Thng CH; Mack MG; Koh TS; Ernemann U
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Sep; 29(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19473200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum-entropy expectation-maximization algorithm for image reconstruction and sensor field estimation.
    Hong H; Schonfeld D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Jun; 17(6):897-907. PubMed ID: 18482885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel quantitative techniques for assessing regional and global function and structure based on modern imaging modalities: implications for normal variation, aging and diseased states.
    Basu S; Zaidi H; Houseni M; Bural G; Udupa J; Acton P; Torigian DA; Alavi A
    Semin Nucl Med; 2007 May; 37(3):223-39. PubMed ID: 17418154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of kinetic parameters without input functions: analysis of three methods for multichannel blind identification.
    Riabkov DY; Di Bella EV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Nov; 49(11):1318-27. PubMed ID: 12450362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.