These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18251420)

  • 1. Carney v Newton: expert evidence about the standard of clinical notes.
    Faunce T; Hammer I; Jefferys S
    J Law Med; 2007 Dec; 15(3):360-5. PubMed ID: 18251420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trial technique. Medical testimony on informed consent and expressed warranty, in a case of TUR (transurethral prostatic resection) with urinary incontinence following, showing the direct and cross-examinations of the defendant urologist, plaintiff's internist, general practitioner, physiatrist, and urologist, and the defendant's urologist, including charge to the jury.
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1969 Sep; 16(1):69-120. PubMed ID: 5343511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.
    Hawkins TS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethics of serving as a plaintiff's expert medical witness.
    Jones JW; McCullough LB; Richman BW
    Surgery; 2004 Jul; 136(1):100-2. PubMed ID: 15232548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The standard of care and expert evidence of accepted practice in medical negligence.
    Manning J
    J Law Med; 2007 Dec; 15(3):394-407. PubMed ID: 18251423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act.
    Rosen MW
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The expert witness: understanding the rationale.
    Brenner RJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Sep; 4(9):612-6. PubMed ID: 17845966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Legal responsibility of the physician for treatment, organization and patient education errors].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1995 Nov; 89(6):562-70. PubMed ID: 8588424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expert witness malfeasance: how should specialty societies respond?
    Feld AD; Carey WD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 May; 100(5):991-5. PubMed ID: 15842567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medical testimony on informed consent and expressed warranty, in a case of TUR (transurethral prostatic resection) with urinary incontinence following, showing the direct and cross-examinations of the defendant urologist, plaintiff's internist, general practitioner, physiatrist, and urologist, and the defendant's urologist, including charge to the jury.
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1970 Jun; 16(4):109-41 contd. PubMed ID: 5425120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical testimony in a diverticulitis of the colon with surgical management case, showing the direct and cross-examination of the defendant surgeon by the plaintiff's and the defendant's lawyers.
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1967 Dec; 14(2):73-97 contd. PubMed ID: 6083043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heterodoxy, iconoclasm and spuriousness: the limits of novel expert evidence.
    Freckelton I
    J Law Med; 2007 Dec; 15(3):323-36. PubMed ID: 18251417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion, breast cancer, and informed consent.
    Kindley J
    Issues Law Med; 2000; 15(3):243-90. PubMed ID: 10758700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Big abortion: what the antiabortion movement can learn from big tobacco.
    Heminger JD
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2005; 54(4):1273-311. PubMed ID: 17115504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent.
    Penhallegon JR
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Legal aspects of medical expert testimony and non-economic damage in civil liability of physician].
    Pauković H
    Lijec Vjesn; 2008; 130(11-12):288-93. PubMed ID: 19146186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Expert evidence. General prerequisites and procedural characteristics for expert opinions].
    Ulsenheimer K
    Anaesthesist; 2005 Nov; 54(11):1081-8. PubMed ID: 16247639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expert witnesses: setting standards--improving credibility.
    Botney M
    Mo Med; 2006; 103(6):579-81. PubMed ID: 17256261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The decline of "informed consent".
    Plant ML
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1978; 35(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 11665008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.