These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Reaction of mock jurors to testimony of a court appointed expert. Cooper J; Hall J Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 11180418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Duty to consult and refer. Hirsh HL Leg Med Annu; 1977; ():247-58. PubMed ID: 579428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Professional and ethical medical expert quality]. Iveković R Lijec Vjesn; 2008; 130(11-12):305-6. PubMed ID: 19146190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Liability of mental health services for injuries incurred during community treatment. Scott R Australas Psychiatry; 2009 Apr; 17(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 19296274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. From expert witness to defendant: abolition of expert witness protection and its implications. Mendelson D J Law Med; 2012 Dec; 20(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 23431843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Medical testimony in a narrowed lumbosacral disc space case, showing the direct and cross-examinations of the plaintiff's and the defendant's general practitioners, and including the final argument of the defendant's lawyer. Med Trial Tech Q; 1967 Dec; 14(2):99-114 contd. PubMed ID: 6083044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Burden of proof in medical cases--presumption of fact and prima facie evidence. 1. Burden of proof]. Sliwka M Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2004; 54(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 15129485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Science and persuasion: environmental disease in U.S. courts. Boden LI; Miyares JR; Ozonoff D Soc Sci Med; 1988; 27(10):1019-29. PubMed ID: 3059501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Principles of the burden of proof in medical liability proceedings (author's transl)]. Minnigerode B Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1975 Jul; 54(7):538-41. PubMed ID: 129619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [The veterinarian in court (2)]. Fellmer E Tierarztl Prax; 1986; 14(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 3738891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 374: Expert testimony. Committee on Ethics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):445-6. PubMed ID: 17666622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Neurologic malpractice: the perspective of a patient's lawyer. Mackauf SH Neurol Clin; 1999 May; 17(2):345-53. PubMed ID: 10196415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Patient follow-up: the scope of the duty, the impact of tort law reform and practical suggestions to comply with legal requirements. Ellis M J Law Med; 2007 Dec; 15(3):408-22. PubMed ID: 18251424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Policy statement--Expert witness participation in civil and criminal proceedings. Committee on Medical Liability and Risk Management Pediatrics; 2009 Jul; 124(1):428-38. PubMed ID: 19564330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Legal issues in dermatology: informed consent, complications and medical malpractice. Goldberg DJ Semin Cutan Med Surg; 2007 Mar; 26(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 17349556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Practical measures to reduce medical expert witness bias. Boyarsky S J Forensic Sci; 1989 Sep; 34(5):1259-65. PubMed ID: 2809550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Re: Ethics of serving as a plaintiff's expert medical witness. Reed DN; Gauvin JM Surgery; 2005 Jun; 137(6):667; author reply 667-9. PubMed ID: 15933642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]