283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18251643)
21. Comparison of magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite and porcine bone in human extraction socket healing: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation.
Crespi R; Capparè P; Gherlone E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1057-62. PubMed ID: 22010090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical evaluation alveolar ridge preservation with a beta-tricalcium phosphate socket graft.
Horowitz RA; Mazor Z; Miller RJ; Krauser J; Prasad HS; Rohrer MD
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2009; 30(9):588-90, 592, 594 passim; quiz 604, 606. PubMed ID: 19998726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Alveolar ridge preservation prior to implant placement with surgical-grade calcium sulfate and platelet-rich plasma: a pilot study in a canine model.
Shi B; Zhou Y; Wang YN; Cheng XR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):656-65. PubMed ID: 17929529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dimensional ridge alterations following socket preservation using a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite paste: a histomorphometrical study in dogs.
Rothamel D; Schwarz F; Herten M; Engelhardt E; Donath K; Kuehn P; Becker J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(8):741-7. PubMed ID: 18554868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Thirty-six month follow-up of 25 patients treated with combination anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix (ABM)/cell-binding peptide (P-15) bone replacement grafts in human infrabony defects. I. Clinical findings.
Yukna RA; Krauser JT; Callan DP; Evans GH; Cruz R; Martin M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 11846193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Principles and implications of site preservation for alveolar ridge development.
Yeo AB; Ong MM
Singapore Dent J; 2004 Dec; 26(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 15736837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Alveolar ridge preservation immediately after tooth extraction.
Feller L; Khammissa RA; Bouckaert M; Lemmer J
SADJ; 2013 Oct; 68(9):408-10. PubMed ID: 24660412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A clinical and histomorphometric study of calcium sulfate compared with freeze-dried bone allograft for alveolar ridge preservation.
Toloue SM; Chesnoiu-Matei I; Blanchard SB
J Periodontol; 2012 Jul; 83(7):847-55. PubMed ID: 22166162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Extraction site reconstruction for alveolar ridge preservation. Part 1: rationale and materials selection.
Bartee BK
J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 12500877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Titanium membranes in prevention of alveolar collapse after tooth extraction.
Pinho MN; Roriz VL; Novaes AB; Taba M; Grisi MF; de Souza SL; Palioto DB
Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 16569962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The use of bovine porous bone mineral in combination with collagen membrane or autologous fibrinogen/fibronectin system for ridge preservation following tooth extraction.
Vasilic N; Henderson R; Jorgenson T; Sutherland E; Carson R
J Okla Dent Assoc; 2003; 93(4):33-8. PubMed ID: 12778623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparing the histological assessment following ridge preservation using a composite bovine-derived xenograft versus an alloplast hydroxyapatite-sugar cross-linked collagen matrix.
Casarez-Quintana A; Mealey BL; Kotsakis G; Palaiologou A
J Periodontol; 2022 Nov; 93(11):1691-1700. PubMed ID: 35661358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of volumetric dimensional changes in posterior extraction sites with and without ARP using a novel imaging device.
Sbordone C; Toti P; Martuscelli R; Guidetti F; Porzio M; Sbordone L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 19(6):1044-1053. PubMed ID: 28905475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Use of titanium mesh for staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation: clinical and histologic-histomorphometric evaluation.
Proussaefs P; Lozada J
J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):237-47. PubMed ID: 17069168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: A 6-month study in the dog.
Araújo MG; Lindhe J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 19522974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of dermal matrix and polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for socket bone augmentation: a clinical and histologic study.
Fotek PD; Neiva RF; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2009 May; 80(5):776-85. PubMed ID: 19405831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ridge preservation after tooth extraction.
Wang RE; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23 Suppl 6():147-56. PubMed ID: 23062139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ridge preservation with or without an osteoinductive allograft: a clinical, radiographic, micro-computed tomography, and histologic study evaluating dimensional changes and new bone formation of the alveolar ridge.
Brownfield LA; Weltman RL
J Periodontol; 2012 May; 83(5):581-9. PubMed ID: 21942791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A prospective randomized clinical study of changes in soft tissue position following immediate and delayed implant placement.
van Kesteren CJ; Schoolfield J; West J; Oates T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):562-70. PubMed ID: 20556256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation: an experimental study in the beagle dog.
Fickl S; Zuhr O; Wachtel H; Bolz W; Huerzeler MB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1111-8. PubMed ID: 18983313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
