250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18253819)
21. Cueing confidence in eyewitness identifications: influence of biased lineup instructions and pre-identification memory feedback under varying lineup conditions.
Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):194-212. PubMed ID: 18600436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Expectancy effect in recognition of persons, or: on the tendency to corroborate perceptual hypotheses].
Stadler M; Fabian T
Z Exp Psychol; 1995; 42(1):132-51. PubMed ID: 8646608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Witnessing-condition heterogeneity and witnesses' versus investigators' confidence in the accuracy of witnesses' identification decisions.
Lindsay DS; Nilsen E; Read JD
Law Hum Behav; 2000 Dec; 24(6):685-97. PubMed ID: 11105479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance.
Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA
Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Witnesses in action: the effect of physical exertion on recall and recognition.
Hope L; Lewinski W; Dixon J; Blocksidge D; Gabbert F
Psychol Sci; 2012 Apr; 23(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 22399414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of eyewitness expert evidence and judicial instruction on juror ability to evaluate eyewitness testimony.
Martire KA; Kemp RI
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 18597165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Change blindness and eyewitness testimony.
Davies G; Hine S
J Psychol; 2007 Jul; 141(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 17725074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory).
Megreya AM; Burton AM
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Dec; 14(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 19102619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The credibility of children's testimony: can children control the accuracy of their memory reports?
Koriat A; Goldsmith M; Schneider W; Nakash-Dura M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Aug; 79(4):405-37. PubMed ID: 11511131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Remembering a criminal conversation: beyond eyewitness testimony.
Campos L; Alonso-Quecuty ML
Memory; 2006 Jan; 14(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 16423739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing nonchoosers' eyewitness identification accuracy from photographic showups by using confidence and response times.
Sauerland M; Sagana A; Sporer SL
Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):394-403. PubMed ID: 23030820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Can eyewitnesses correct for external influences on their lineup identifications? The actual/counterfactual assessment paradigm.
Charman SD; Wells GL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 18377163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of face age on identification from a video line-up: a comparison between older and younger adults.
Havard C; Memon A
Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):847-59. PubMed ID: 19882436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of local and global processing orientation on eyewitness identification performance.
Perfect TJ; Dennis I; Snell A
Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):784-98. PubMed ID: 17852730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How should witnesses regulate the accuracy of their identification decisions: one step forward, two steps back?
Perfect TJ; Weber N
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1810-8. PubMed ID: 22563633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions.
Molinaro PF; Charman SD; Wylie K
Law Hum Behav; 2021 Dec; 45(6):524-541. PubMed ID: 34661424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency.
Brewer N; Caon A; Todd C; Weber N
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Feb; 30(1):31-50. PubMed ID: 16729207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Eyewitness recall: Regulation of grain size and the role of confidence.
Weber N; Brewer N
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 18377166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
