These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18253819)

  • 41. Probative value of absolute and relative judgments in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE; Erickson MA; Breneman J
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):364-80. PubMed ID: 20953683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Are accurate witnesses more likely to make absolute judgments?
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Lemieux JM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008 Dec; 31(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 18954905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The man behind the mask: accuracy and predictors of eyewitness offender descriptions.
    Fahsing IA; Ask K; Granhag PA
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Aug; 89(4):722-9. PubMed ID: 15327357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: a 10- to 12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications.
    Dunning D; Perretta S
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Oct; 87(5):951-62. PubMed ID: 12395819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Some experimental influences of lawyers' complicated questions on eyewitness confidence and accuracy.
    Kebbell MR; Giles DC
    J Psychol; 2000 Mar; 134(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 10766104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The distance threshold of reliable eyewitness identification.
    Nyman TJ; Lampinen JM; Antfolk J; Korkman J; Santtila P
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Dec; 43(6):527-541. PubMed ID: 31294577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification decisions: Effects of exposure duration, retention interval, and divided attention.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N; Nagesh A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Mar; 19(1):55-71. PubMed ID: 23544475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A signal-detection analysis of eyewitness identification across the adult lifespan.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Wixted JT; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2017 May; 32(3):243-258. PubMed ID: 28504536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The mitigating effects of suspicion on post-identification feedback and on retrospective eyewitness memory.
    Neuschatz JS; Lawson DS; Fairless AH; Powers RA; Neuschatz JS; Goodsell CA; Toglia MP
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):231-47. PubMed ID: 17253155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of eyewitness identification is significantly associated with performance on a standardized test of face recognition.
    Morgan CA; Hazlett G; Baranoski M; Doran A; Southwick S; Loftus E
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(3):213-23. PubMed ID: 17449097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy.
    Beresford J; Blades M
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 16953771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Is manipulative intent necessary to mitigate the eyewitness post-identification feedback effect?
    Quinlivan DS; Wells GL; Neuschatz JS
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Jun; 34(3):186-97. PubMed ID: 19399600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to assess eyewitness accuracy and deception.
    Lefebvre CD; Marchand Y; Smith SM; Connolly JF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 19303425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Lineup administrators' expectations: their impact on eyewitness confidence.
    Garrioch L; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Jun; 25(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 11480805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Are multiple-trial experiments appropriate for eyewitness identification studies? Accuracy, choosing, and confidence across trials.
    Mansour JK; Beaudry JL; Lindsay RCL
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Dec; 49(6):2235-2254. PubMed ID: 28432569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of stress induced by a simulated shooting on recall by police and citizen witnesses.
    Stanny CJ; Johnson TC
    Am J Psychol; 2000; 113(3):359-86. PubMed ID: 10997233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Adults usually believe young children: the influence of eliciting questions and suggestibility presentations on perceptions of children's disclosures.
    Laimon RL; Poole DA
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Dec; 32(6):489-501. PubMed ID: 18236143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of post-identification feedback, delay, and suspicion on accurate eyewitnesses.
    Quinlivan DS; Neuschatz JS; Douglass AB; Wells GL; Wetmore SA
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 22667810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Divided attention at encoding: effect on feeling-of-knowing.
    Sacher M; Taconnat L; Souchay C; Isingrini M
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):754-61. PubMed ID: 19423362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups.
    Steblay NK
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20177754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.