These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18254145)

  • 1. Re: A direct method for ultrasound prediction of day of delivery: a new, population-based approach. Problems of accounting for a retrospective selection.
    Kiserud T; Johnsen SL; Rasmussen S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 31(2):225; author reply 225-7. PubMed ID: 18254145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A direct method for ultrasound prediction of day of delivery: a new, population-based approach.
    Gjessing HK; Grøttum P; Eik-Nes SH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 30(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 17557369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advantages of the population-based approach to pregnancy dating: results from 23,020 ultrasound examinations.
    Økland I; Nakling J; Gjessing HK; Grøttum P; Eik-Nes SH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 21898635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new population-based term prediction model vs. two traditional sample-based models: validation on 9046 ultrasound examinations.
    Okland I; Gjessing HK; Grøttum P; Eggebø TM; Eik-Nes SH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Feb; 37(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 20560133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Term prediction with ultrasound: evaluation of a new dating curve for biparietal diameter measurements.
    Backe B; Nakling J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 16532907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biases of traditional term prediction models: results from different sample-based models evaluated on 41 343 ultrasound examinations.
    Økland I; Gjessing HK; Grøttum P; Eik-Nes SH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 36(6):728-34. PubMed ID: 20533451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regarding "Term prediction with ultrasound: evaluation of a new dating curve for biparietal diameter".
    Eik-Nes SH; Grøttum P; Gjessing H
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(10):1276-8; author reply 1278-9. PubMed ID: 17068693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Small biparietal diameter in the first trimester and pregnancy outcome.
    Socolov D; Deloison B; Bernard JP; Ville Y; Salomon LJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 42(4):484. PubMed ID: 23554066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can third trimester ultrasound predict the presentation of the first twin at delivery?
    Schwartz R; Fuchs A; Rosenn B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Nov; 25(11):2432-4. PubMed ID: 22680064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expected day of delivery from ultrasound dating versus last menstrual period--obstetric outcome when dates mismatch.
    Thorsell M; Kaijser M; Almström H; Andolf E
    BJOG; 2008 Apr; 115(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 18333938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The length of human pregnancy as calculated by ultrasonographic measurement of the fetal biparietal diameter.
    Kieler H; Axelsson O; Nilsson S; Waldenström U
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 6(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 8590208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Doppler assessment of the uterine circulation in the second trimester in twin pregnancies: prediction of pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction and birth weight discordance.
    Geipel A; Berg C; Germer U; Katalinic A; Krapp M; Smrcek J; Gembruch U
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):541-5. PubMed ID: 12493041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intrapartum sonography sign for occiput posterior asynclitism diagnosis.
    Malvasi A; Tinelli A; Stark M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Mar; 24(3):553-4. PubMed ID: 20629498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?
    Doubilet PM
    Semin Perinatol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):307-9. PubMed ID: 24176152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
    Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
    Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonically measured biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference: intra- and interobserver variation in the third trimester.
    Vine DG; Cooperberg PL; Dansereau J
    Am J Perinatol; 1992; 9(5-6):385-7. PubMed ID: 1418140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Metrorrhagia during the second trimester of pregnancy: obstetrical and perinatal outcome. A retrospective study including 85 cases].
    Parant O; Clouet-Delannoy M; Connan L; Duclusaud A; Chale J; Fournié A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Feb; 29(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 10675835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Ultrasound of cervix uteri transvaginal in preterm birth].
    Onofriescu M; Târnovanu M; Scurtu B; Luca A; Radu E; Iftime I
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2006; 110(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 19292086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrapartum sonography asynclitism diagnosis by transperineal ultrasonography.
    Malvasi A; Tinelli A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Jun; 31(11):1530-1531. PubMed ID: 28460545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of severe complications in a risk population.
    Axt-Fliedner R; Schwarze A; Nelles I; Altgassen C; Friedrich M; Schmidt W; Diedrich K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Jan; 271(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 15175886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.