These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18254258)

  • 1. [Thoughts about the gastroesophageal reflux redefinition and classification regarding the Montreal Consensus].
    Chiocca JC; Salis G
    Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2007 Dec; 37(4):213-5. PubMed ID: 18254258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Italian validation of the Montreal Global definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Pace F; Bazzoli F; Fiocca R; Di Mario F; Savarino V; Vigneri S; Vakil N
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Apr; 21(4):394-408. PubMed ID: 19262401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global, evidence-based consensus paper].
    Vakil N; van Zanten SV; Kahrilas P; Dent J; Jones R;
    Z Gastroenterol; 2007 Nov; 45(11):1125-40. PubMed ID: 18027314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Montreal classification: a consensus with single PHARMA sponsor and paid participants.
    Graham DY
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):460-1; author reply 461-2. PubMed ID: 17311665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Montreal, Rome, and Lyon Consensus: Will They Resolve the Conundrum of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
    Mittal RK
    Gastroenterology; 2021 Dec; 161(6):1776-1779. PubMed ID: 34461054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Argument on statement 46 in the Montreal definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease: does reflux laryngitis patient always have heartburn?
    Oridate N; Takeda H
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Apr; 102(4):911-2. PubMed ID: 17397421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A global, evidence-based consensus on the definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the pediatric population].
    Sherman PM; Hassall E; Fagundes-Neto U; Gold BD; Kato S; Koletzko S; Orenstein S; Rudolph C; Vakil N; Vandenplas Y
    Arch Pediatr; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1586-93. PubMed ID: 20943357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Proposal for a new endoscopic classification of the gastroesophageal reflux disease].
    Vasil'ev IuV
    Eksp Klin Gastroenterol; 2005; (3):64-8. PubMed ID: 16255556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A global, evidence-based consensus on the definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the pediatric population.
    Sherman PM; Hassall E; Fagundes-Neto U; Gold BD; Kato S; Koletzko S; Orenstein S; Rudolph C; Vakil N; Vandenplas Y
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1278-95; quiz 1296. PubMed ID: 19352345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An international primary care survey of GERD terminology and guidelines.
    Vakil N; Malfertheiner P; Salis G; Flook N; Hongo M
    Dig Dis; 2008; 26(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 18463441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease].
    Blaszak A; Wojtuń S; Gil J; Wojtkowiak M; Dyrla P; Jałocha Ł
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2009 May; 26(155):521-3. PubMed ID: 19606715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An important consensus statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease for the largest population in the world.
    Sampliner RE
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Apr; 23(4):505. PubMed ID: 18397478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease redefined: Implications for primary care.
    Jones R; Rubin G; de Wit N; Seifert B; Agreus L
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2007; 13(4):214-5. PubMed ID: 18324501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 'Chalasia' terminology and treatment questioned.
    O'Hara S
    Nurse Pract; 1989 Aug; 14(8):10. PubMed ID: 2771208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic grading of reflux oesophagitis: the past, present and future.
    Dent J
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2008; 22(4):585-99. PubMed ID: 18656818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissent from the consensus on the redefinition of myocardial infarction.
    Norris RM
    Eur Heart J; 2001 Sep; 22(17):1626-7. PubMed ID: 11492994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acid gastroesophageal reflux in symptomatic infants is primarily a function of classic 2-phase and pH-only acid reflux event types.
    Woodley FW; Hayes J; Mousa H
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2009 May; 48(5):550-8. PubMed ID: 19412006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Gastroesophageal reflux disease--diagnosis and management].
    Wojtuń S; Gil J; Jałocha Ł; Błaszak A; Wojtkowiak M
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2009 May; 26(155):512-6. PubMed ID: 19606713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Impedance-pH analysis in gastroesophageal reflux monitoring].
    Szaflarska-Popławska A; Popławski C; Mierzwa G
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Oct; 23(136):302-6. PubMed ID: 18293856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The nonerosive reflux disease-gastroesophageal reflux disease controversy.
    Winter JW; Heading RC
    Curr Opin Gastroenterol; 2008 Jul; 24(4):509-15. PubMed ID: 18622168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.